Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

He said, 'If you come on my land, I'll kill you'
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1000land.htm ^

Posted on 01/27/2007 1:36:11 PM PST by tpaine

By Vin Suprynowicz

For years, Garry Watson, 49, of little Bunker, Mo., (population 390) had been squabbling with town officials over the sewage line easement which ran across his property to the adjoining, town-operated sewage lagoon.

Residents say officials grew dissatisfied with their existing easement, and announced they were going to excavate a new sewer line across the landowner's property. Capt. Chris Ricks of the Missouri Highway Patrol reports Watson's wife, Linda, was served with "easement right-of-way papers" on Sept. 6. She gave the papers to Watson when he got home at 5 a.m. the next morning from his job at a car battery recycling plant northeast of Bunker. Watson reportedly went to bed for a short time, but arose about 7 a.m. when the city work crew arrived.

"He told them 'If you come on my land, I'll kill you,' " Bunker resident Gregg Tivnan told me last week. "Then the three city workers showed up with a backhoe, plus a police officer. They'd sent along a cop in a cop car to guard the workers, because they were afraid there might be trouble. Watson had gone inside for a little while, but then he came out and pulled his SKS (semi-automatic rifle) out of his truck, steadied it against the truck, and he shot them."

Killed in the September 7 incident, from a range of about 85 yards, were Rocky B. Gordon, 34, a city maintenance man, and David Thompson, 44, an alderman who supervised public works. City maintenance worker Delmar Eugene Dunn, 51, remained in serious but stable condition the following weekend.

Bunker police Officer Steve Stoops, who drove away from the scene after being shot, was treated and released from a hospital for a bullet wound to his arm and a graze to the neck.

Watson thereupon kissed his wife goodbye, took his rifle, and disappeared into the woods, where his body was found two days later -- dead of an apparently self-inflicted gunshot wound.

Following such incidents, the local papers are inevitably filled with well-meaning but mawkish doggerel about the townsfolk "pulling together" and attempting to "heal" following the "tragedy." There are endless expressions of frustration, pretending to ask how such an otherwise peaceful member of the community could "just snap like that."

In fact, the supposedly elusive explanation is right before our eyes.

"He was pushed," Clarence Rosemann -- manager of the local Bunker convenience store, who'd done some excavation work for Watson -- told the big-city reporters from St. Louis. Another area resident, who didn't want to be identified, told the visiting newsmen, "Most people are understanding why Garry Watson was upset. They are wishing he didn't do it, but they are understanding why he did it."

You see, to most of the people who work in government and the media these days -- especially in our urban centers -- "private property" is a concept out of some dusty, 18th century history book. Oh, sure, "property owners" are allowed to live on their land, so long as they pay rent to the state in the form of "property taxes."

But an actual "right" to be let alone on our land to do whatever we please -- always providing we don't actually endanger the lives or health of our neighbors?

Heavens! If we allowed that, how would we enforce all our wonderful new "environmental protection" laws, or the "zoning codes," or the laws against growing hemp or tobacco or distilling whisky without a license, or any of the endless parade of other malum prohibitum decrees which have multiplied like swarms of flying ants in this nation over the past 87 years?

What does it mean to say we have any "rights" or "freedoms" at all, if we cannot peacefully enjoy that property which we buy with the fruits of our labors?

In his 1985 book "Takings," University of Chicago Law Professor Richard Epstein wrote that, "Private property gives the right to exclude others without the need for any justification.

Indeed, it is the ability to act at will and without need for justification within some domain which is the essence of freedom, be it of speech or of property."

"Unfortunately," replies James Bovard, author of the book "Freedom in Chains: The Rise of the State and the Demise of the Citizen," "federal law enforcement agents and prosecutors are making private property much less private. ...

Park Forest, Ill. in 1994 enacted an ordinance that authorizes warrantless searches of every single-family rental home by a city inspector or police officer, who are authorized to invade rental units 'at all reasonable times.' ... Federal Judge Joan Gottschall struck down the searches as unconstitutional in 1998, but her decision will have little or no effect on the numerous other localities that authorize similar invasions of privacy."

We are now involved in a war in this nation, a last-ditch struggle in which the other side contends only the king's men are allowed to use force or the threat of force to push their way in wherever they please, and that any peasant finally rendered so desperate as to employ the same kind of force routinely employed by our oppressors must surely be a "lone madman" who "snapped for no reason." No, we should not and do not endorse or approve the individual choices of folks like Garry Watson. But we are still obliged to honor their memories and the personal courage it takes to fight and die for a principle, even as we lament both their desperate, misguided actions ... and the systematic erosion of our liberties which gave them rise.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: castledoctrine; kelo; privateproperty; propertyrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,061-1,079 next last
To: spunkets
"The emploer's parking desion must be restricted to considerstionof the vehicle only."

Not only are you making up words, now you're making up laws.

Post the law to back that restriction up.

"Sovereignty of the vehicle's interior belongs solely to the employee."

You're making a case for the right to steal from your employer.

Sovereignty to the contents of the land belongs solely to the person who owns it, and if that individual decides that the only way they will allow you access to their property if if you agree to your car being searched, then you either agree to that search, or turn away from the property.

Real simple...

Let's say that I own a company, and I have security guards posted at the entrance to its grounds.

There is a sign that advices you that in order for your vehicle to enter the property, you must agree to a search by the security guards, and that it will be searched again on the way out.

You approach the gate and refuse to let them search your vehicle, they refuse to grant you access.

End of story.

You have absolutely no right to be on someone else's property without their permission.

481 posted on 01/28/2007 10:15:37 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

Have you now pulled your support for the 'gun-grabbing' GA bill?


482 posted on 01/28/2007 10:16:39 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 477 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Exactly. An honorable man would have fired warning shots, ran them off his land, and then tried to justify his action.

REPLY:

Honor has nothing to do with anything when citizens are pushed over the edge.

Once over the edge, sane logical thinking no longer comes into play.

Once a person feels so helpless that nothing can be done to stop what he or she considers a grievous action then they take radical measures.

I see this same kind of helplessness in the form of road rage from otherwise good hearted citizens on the freeways here in California.

We live in an age of anxiety where the world and our lives are going to be destroyed by every perceived thing under the Sun.

Global warming in say a few hundred years is a real example of the sky is falling attitude of the Dimocrats.
483 posted on 01/28/2007 10:19:04 AM PST by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OKIEDOC

--Honor has nothing to do with anything when citizens are pushed over the edge.--

He should never have bought the land if he didn't want them to use the easement. He wasn't "pushed". He just lost it.


484 posted on 01/28/2007 10:21:05 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: UpAllNight
Red herring argument. Whether the yard was "flooded" or not, there was a leak (just in case you've never smelled a sewer leak, trust me, it's very obvious), it was the city's reposnsibility to fix it, and they didn't. Watson had to use his own money to do so (excavation and fixing a sewer line isn't cheap, either, especially on the budget of someone who works at a battery recycling plant). Evidently, the city didn't compensate him for it either.

Yeah, I'd be angry, too.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

485 posted on 01/28/2007 10:21:11 AM PST by wku man (Claire Wolfe's "awkward time" is quickly coming to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez

--Post the law to back that restriction up.--

We could post the GA bill which you have said that you agree with but that isn't law yet.


486 posted on 01/28/2007 10:22:02 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

"you called him insane, not me...."

"beyond rationality" intimates insanity.


one can surmise that the man who reacted so violently was subject to tyranny, the duration and intensity probably commensurate with the reaction.



487 posted on 01/28/2007 10:22:03 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: wku man

--Red herring argument. Whether the yard was "flooded" or not, there was a leak (just in case you've never smelled a sewer leak, trust me, it's very obvious), it was the city's reposnsibility to fix it, and they didn't. --

Oh, it is ok to post false statements but when called on it shout "Red Herring" to the person that outs your false statement. Good debating tactic.


488 posted on 01/28/2007 10:23:11 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: wku man

--there was a leak --

Did you make that up?


489 posted on 01/28/2007 10:23:38 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: UpAllNight
No, I didn't duck the question. A lot of the answer was implied: "Read the article" (and you will understand I didn't just make it up).

Now, a question to you: did you read the argument? A follow-up: wouldn't you be angry if you were in Mr. Watson's boots?

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

490 posted on 01/28/2007 10:24:12 AM PST by wku man (Claire Wolfe's "awkward time" is quickly coming to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: ripley

--one can surmise that the man who reacted so violently was subject to tyranny, the duration and intensity probably commensurate with the reaction.--

What tyranny. He bought a piece of property that included an easement. If he didn't like that easement, he should never have bought the property.


491 posted on 01/28/2007 10:24:38 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: UpAllNight
I guess you've never smelled a sewer leak, have you?

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

492 posted on 01/28/2007 10:25:15 AM PST by wku man (Claire Wolfe's "awkward time" is quickly coming to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]

To: wku man

The article says nothing about a leak or raw sewage so you must have made that up.


493 posted on 01/28/2007 10:25:34 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: wku man

--I guess you've never smelled a sewer leak, have you?--

Yes. But what does that have to do with this except that you have made it up that there was a raw sewage leak.


494 posted on 01/28/2007 10:27:08 AM PST by UpAllNight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: UpAllNight
Okay, maybe this will require a little logical reasoning, but why would a man go to the trouble and expense of digging up a sewer line, if it weren't leaking?

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

495 posted on 01/28/2007 10:29:43 AM PST by wku man (Claire Wolfe's "awkward time" is quickly coming to an end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: UpAllNight

Did Poland buy property with an easement prior to World War II? Did France? Did Ghengis Khan's mongol hordes riding bloody across the tundra have an easement? Did the Black Plague that swept across Europe have an easement?


496 posted on 01/28/2007 10:29:55 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: durasell; tpaine
Durasell wrote: "Yep. Americans by nature are suspicious of gubmint -- which is a good thing. But when it crosses a line, then it's a symptom of something else."

Tpaine once wrote: "You ever read "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross?
Good example of 'my line'. -- A clear effort by our governments to deprive us of any of our fundamental individual rights would involve me in an insurrection or revolution."

Durasell, I have a question for you. You inferred in your post that when I or perhaps any of my fellow citizens become overly suspicious of the actions of government something will happen and a line will be crossed.

I tagged Tpaine so that he would, like me, be appraised of your answer to my question.

By now, you must be aware of the fact that this country was founded by a group of men who had just recently been involved in a rebellion against the government. This line thing intrigues me. Is it the moment in time where we as as citizens of this great nation embark upon another such adventure? Is what Garry Watson did just a precursor to what is to come?

I do not know and that is why I ask you.

Semper Fi
An Old Man

497 posted on 01/28/2007 10:31:06 AM PST by An Old Man (USMC 1956 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: UpAllNight
Many in governments of all sizes, especially here in California do not feel the individual has rights.

This thinking comes from those who have a It Takes A Village mentality to run this country.

I have dealt with easements on my ranch property from everyone, state and county government to oil and gas company pipelines.

The oil companies are the best to deal with.

The local county government seems to always deal from a threatening tone, constantly.
498 posted on 01/28/2007 10:31:08 AM PST by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: Artemis Webb
The Battle of Lexington and Concord was citizen militia's (sic) against British troops. The militia's (sic) didn't go shoot the blacksmith and the nice lady at the seamstress shop.

That's because the village blacksmith and the nice lady seamstress were not among the British troops. If they had been, they undoubtedly would have been shot at.

Using the Boston Tea Party as an analogy here was simply a poor choice on your part.

CA....

499 posted on 01/28/2007 10:32:42 AM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: tpaine

>>But killing these working men for "the principle" of the ability to act at will and without need for justification" is beyond rationality.<<

And that is what other people in the area said. They also said he was pushed.

One thing is for sure, if more people did it, we would all enjoy more freedom. In a real way, one could say he gave his life for our freedom.

Who is John Galt?


500 posted on 01/28/2007 10:34:40 AM PST by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in 1938.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,061-1,079 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson