So now you say Rudy is against the Constitution and Citizens rights?
I'm not one bit shocked you would say something as baseless as that.
P.S your definition of Totalitarian Populism is correct up to the point of the "party to which he is a member" The correct definition should be ammended to read; "individual philosophy of the majority"
The second amendment is a part of the constituion, and rudy is against it. The same constitution which he would swear to support and defend is the one he would pay lip service to.
It is a citizens right to be protected from invasions of our borders, which Rudy is for. That's not exactly stron on defense, either, which rudy-lovers claim is his strong suit, too.
My points are accurate, not at all baseless as you claim