Skip to comments.
Physicists Develop Test for String Theory
Space Daily ^
| Jan 25, 2007
| Staff Writers
Posted on 01/25/2007 9:01:26 AM PST by Ben Mugged
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: Ben Mugged
[Visualize photo of kitten with ball of yarn here]
2
posted on
01/25/2007 9:04:01 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(Pelosi, the call was for Comity, not Comedy. But thanks for the laughs. StarKisses, NVA.)
To: Ben Mugged
The LHC should have been built in America and have been in operation for a decade already.
3
posted on
01/25/2007 9:07:10 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Ben Mugged
And if the tests fail, they'll just change the parameters.
4
posted on
01/25/2007 9:07:21 AM PST
by
flashbunny
(If the founding fathers were alive today, they'd be plucking feathers and boiling tar.)
To: Ben Mugged
If you have all the feathers you can carry, can you carry one more??
5
posted on
01/25/2007 9:08:58 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
To: Ben Mugged
I thought they added an 11th dimension to String theory and now call in M theory (membrane theory) and this is where the theory of parallel universes comes from.
6
posted on
01/25/2007 9:09:59 AM PST
by
joebuck
To: joebuck
They run their models in a variety of dimensions from four to 26. Sometimes one dimension.
7
posted on
01/25/2007 9:14:23 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: NonValueAdded
The universe is made of "Silly String"........
8
posted on
01/25/2007 9:15:23 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Rachel Carson is responsible for more deaths than Adolf Hitler...............)
To: flashbunny
It all assumes that there is such a thing as a W boson, and that it does what they theorize that it does. I don't think that there is any doubt about that among quantum physicists, but the discovery of the W boson, like much of the rest of particle physics, is heavily dependent upon the accuracy of the prior theoretical framework.
9
posted on
01/25/2007 9:20:00 AM PST
by
Brilliant
To: Ben Mugged
"The canonical forms of string theory include three mathematical assumptions-Lorentz invariance ..., analyticity ... and unitarity ... Our test sets bounds on these assumptions."Is there anyone who supposes there can be a successful physical theory that doesn't have these characteristics? I only hope this explanation has been dumbed down because it doesn't sound impressive to me.
10
posted on
01/25/2007 9:20:44 AM PST
by
edsheppa
To: edsheppa
11
posted on
01/25/2007 9:22:34 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: RightWhale
12
posted on
01/25/2007 9:23:05 AM PST
by
DManA
To: DManA
The USA killed the supercollider and the Apollo program and is now in the process of falling behind the rest of the world leaders in science and engineering.
13
posted on
01/25/2007 9:26:30 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Ben Mugged; Millee; Allegra; Jersey Republican Biker Chick; carlr; PaulaB; Maximus of Texas; ...
Hummmm...
What sting theory...

do I believe in?
This...

one!!!
It is the one EX52D wore when she was a sophmore at Grand Cayman University...
14
posted on
01/25/2007 9:28:07 AM PST
by
Bender2
(Gad, Millee! 1st Lindsy goes into rehab, then you bust a gut to get my attention...)
To: RightWhale
That's a function of our failing government schools, not a lack of science boondoggles.
in the process of falling behind the rest of the world leaders in science and engineering.
15
posted on
01/25/2007 9:28:39 AM PST
by
DManA
To: Ben Mugged
Perhaps they could study the super-string theory of cheese.

A moose once dated my sister.
The chef is here. Good eats for everyone.
'La bonne cuisine est la base du véritable bonheur.' - Auguste Escoffier
(Good food is the foundation of genuine happiness.)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
16
posted on
01/25/2007 9:30:15 AM PST
by
LonePalm
(Commander and Chef)
To: DManA
Pres Bush mentioned math and science education during the SOTU address. Hillary! appears to have no interest in math or science at all. The pupils would do much better at math and science if there were some hope of actually being employed in math or science, even if it is, ughh, FedGov science programs. Math and science are adequately taught in government schools, but interest in attending math and science class is waning.
17
posted on
01/25/2007 9:34:06 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
To: Ben Mugged
Maybe they will finally unravel this knotty problem.
18
posted on
01/25/2007 9:35:11 AM PST
by
EEDUDE
To: RightWhale
There are finite dollars to invest in basic science. Should we pick a few super projects or spread it out in many more smaller projects? I think the latter is more inspiring to aspiring scientists.
19
posted on
01/25/2007 9:43:51 AM PST
by
DManA
To: Ben Mugged
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson