Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JCRoberts

$7.25 an hour? Who can live on that?

How cruel, who would vote for such a thing?

It need to be at least $17.25, or even better $57.25.

I could see a lot of Congressmen proudly voting for $57.25, but $7.25? no way.


24 posted on 01/24/2007 4:23:23 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Balding_Eagle

I wish people would emphasize the fact that minimum-wage jobs are not intended for raising a family. They are just that - entry-level wages for simplistic work. Somehow the public feels that a burger flipper should make enough to feed a family of five. This is insanity!! SSZ


26 posted on 01/24/2007 4:30:42 PM PST by szweig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Balding_Eagle
$7.25 an hour? Who can live on that?

Your comment reminds me of an incident that happened in the 80's. George Gervin, a Bball player for the SA Spurs, complained that he only made $360,000/yr and "nobody can live on that." So, a Dallas radio station took pity on the "Iceman", and started a collection to help him out. After 2 months, they sent all of the money they had collected to George " The Iceman" Gervin; all $0.63 of it.

I'm sure it improved his standard of living, but the higher tax bracket probably didn't help him any!! LOLOL!!!!!!

29 posted on 01/24/2007 6:19:52 PM PST by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson