I've always thought it the most plausable theory.
It may have been her money that got him into Washington, but I am sure he paid back that investment back many times over with the money he 'earned' and received while in Washington.
As do I.
Repeat after me:
There is no conspiracy.
Every recent assassination has been done by a lone nut job.
There is no conspiracy.
Repeat as needed until you feel better.
I've always thought it the most plausable theory.
_________
Actually, the MOST plausible theory is that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy. If you REALLY research the subject there is no doubt that Oswald killed Kennedy. There are so many myths on this subject it's incredible. I'll give you two popular ones.
1. Oswald couldn't do the shooting. Total Fallacy, it was not difficult at all. A 70 year old man was shown getting off the shots with 2 seconds with the same rifle to spare in the time frame Oswald shot.
2. "Back and to the Left" with the headshot and the entry and exit wounds. Both are demonstrative of a shot from behind, many tests have been done, bullets can do a variety of things when hitting a target but what Kennedy's head did was most consistent of a head shot from behind. The entry and exit wounds leave NO DOUBT that the bullet came from behind.
That was my FIRST theory when it happen in 63 and I haven't changed my mind.
The problem I have with this is that unless he presents facts in the book, not speculation, he's doing everyone a disservice. If you are going to make claims like that at least make them when you are alive to back up what you say.
I've always believed it was LBJ.
Sometimes the most obvious answer is the right answer.