To: doug from upland
And it was how cold there last week?
2 posted on
01/23/2007 6:36:06 PM PST by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: RightWhale
Keep this in mind as they try to sell the Alaska LNG export terminal. Many in the lower 48 don't want the import terminal.
3 posted on
01/23/2007 6:36:11 PM PST by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: doug from upland
Some 85,000 people live within three-miles of the site with another 350,000 within five miles.
And their point is?
4 posted on
01/23/2007 6:37:55 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(Peace without victory is a temporary illusion.)
To: doug from upland
What a shockerooski! Imagine Californians being against drilling, power plants, and even imported energy.
Who'd a thunk that?
6 posted on
01/23/2007 6:40:01 PM PST by
Dog Gone
To: doug from upland
Way to go. I look forward to see Californians continuing to pay astronomical energy prices.
How is refinery-free life working out for all y'all? Now to stop the pipelines, too, in the northern suburbs and shantytowns of Greater Tijuana.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
10 posted on
01/23/2007 6:46:07 PM PST by
Criminal Number 18F
(Maybe the war is lost but let's still kill the enemy, just to offend Nancy Pelosi)
To: doug from upland
At least it wasn't UAE's project. Then it would be Bush's fault.
17 posted on
01/23/2007 6:59:30 PM PST by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
To: doug from upland
The Luddites are alive and well in California....and Washington where I live.
The elites, smarter than most of us, are afraid of technology.
Go figure.....
23 posted on
01/23/2007 7:20:59 PM PST by
HardStarboard
(The Democrats are more afraid of American Victory than Defeat!)
To: doug from upland
Well I'm sure that they can build it in Mexico and the USA will slip deeper into the throes foreign energy dependence.
To: doug from upland
35 posted on
01/23/2007 10:36:53 PM PST by
blam
To: doug from upland
aw the C.A.V.E.M.E.N prevail once again.
49 posted on
01/24/2007 4:20:58 PM PST by
mad_as_he$$
(So many geeks, so few circuses.)
To: doug from upland
For once LB has done something right. It's a great idea for a bad location. There is too much risk for such little financial reward. Personally, I'm glad city hall won't get their hands on the money because they would most assuredly piss it away. An LNG terminal will eventually be built...hopefully somewhere offshore where it makes more sense.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson