Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Confidence in Bush Leadership at All-Time Low, Poll Finds
Washington Post.com ^ | 1/22/07 | Dan Balz and Jon Cohen

Posted on 01/22/2007 4:09:46 PM PST by alienken

Confidence in Bush Leadership at All-Time Low, Poll Finds President Bush will deliver his State of the Union address on Tuesday at the weakest point of his presidency, facing deep public dissatisfaction over his Iraq war policies and eroding confidence in his leadership, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll. With a major confrontation between Congress and the president brewing over Iraq, Americans overwhelmingly oppose Bush's plan to send an additional 21,500 troops to the conflict. By wide margins, they prefer that congressional Democrats, who now hold majorities in both chambers, rather than the president, take the lead in setting the direction for the country. Iraq dominates the national agenda, with 48 percent of Americans calling the war the single most important issue they want Bush and the Congress to deal with this year. No other issue rises out of single digits. The poll also found that the public trusts congressional Democrats over Bush to deal with the conflict by a margin of 60 percent to 33 percent. The president will use his speech to try to rally public opinion behind the troop deployment plan, but during the past 10 days he has made no headway in changing public opinion. The Post-ABC poll shows that 65 percent of Americans oppose sending more troops to Iraq; it was 61 percent immediately after the president unveiled the plan on Jan. 10 in a nationally televised address. The Senate plans to take up a nonbinding bipartisan resolution opposing the president's new plan for troop deployments. But many Democrats in both chambers advocate even stronger measures designed to block the deployment of the additional troops, including capping the number of troops at their levels of Jan. 1 or putting strings on the money for the new troops......

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: alienken

It didn't help Reagan.

And .. you have to remember that these lefty pollsters use 14-16% over-weighting of dems in order to get the polls numbers they want.

The dems no long have that kind of advantage .. and elections prove it. We are more of a 50-50 country but the polls do not raflect that. And .. in the repub camp - Bush polls at around 75-79% - which is really good. If the pollsters would use the proper amount of repubs in their polls .. the President would probably be at 45-49% - but that doesn't fit the dems agenda.


61 posted on 01/22/2007 6:24:04 PM PST by CyberAnt (Drive-By Media: Fake news, fake documents, fake polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosquewatch.com

Agreed, and this President just like all the others continues to do NOTHING.

Does that make him worse than Reagan, who agreed to an amnesty?


62 posted on 01/22/2007 6:27:17 PM PST by popdonnelly (Our first obligation is to keep the power of the Presidency out of the hands of the Clintons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: alienken
Forgetting 9-11 has become the new national pastime for many Americans, including so-called conservatives who fixate on the inane.
63 posted on 01/22/2007 6:30:04 PM PST by new yorker 77 (Speaker Pelosi - Three cheers for Amnesty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
got a more conservative Supreme Court

That remains to be proven??

64 posted on 01/22/2007 6:38:47 PM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
The President hasn't been 'dumping' on anyone. In fact, the OPPOSITE is what is true

You've got to stop putting that wild turkey in your coffee.

65 posted on 01/22/2007 6:43:41 PM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Not really. Time of course will tell, but Alito's track record is already better than O'Conner's, whom he replaced.


66 posted on 01/22/2007 6:48:36 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
where it mans something.

Makes as much sense as your other meaningless dribble.

67 posted on 01/22/2007 6:51:34 PM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Time of course will tell, but Alito's track record is already better than O'Conner's, whom he replaced.

So you agree with me. So why write things you don't really believe?

68 posted on 01/22/2007 7:00:10 PM PST by org.whodat (Never let the facts get in the way of a good assumption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I don't agree with you.


69 posted on 01/22/2007 7:04:31 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
they posted a 9 point oversampling for Democrats/Democrat-leaning Independents!

Seems appropriate, as Democrats took about 9 percentage points more than Republicans in the elections last November.
70 posted on 01/22/2007 7:07:19 PM PST by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb
Predictably, the MSM is using its 'manufactured' polls to convince the American public

Well why the hell doesn't Bush do something about the MSM.

Putin, Castro and the Democrats all know you don't let an enemy media run amok and destroy your reputation.

Sometimes the reporter has an accident, sometimes the reporter diasppears or is hit with a year in the cooler and sooner or later they get the idea that screwing around with national security for political gain just isn't very smart, there are CONSEQUENCES.

The Bush administration hasn't even tried to wage a propaganda war at home, they have surrendered to the leftists whose victory is just about total.

Hell of a way to support the troops.

71 posted on 01/22/2007 7:21:52 PM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: alienken

The people have been fed lies and negativity by the MSM/DNC since before the 2000 election. Just what do you expect them to think now?

All they know is that Iraq was a massive screw up by Bush, and Bush hasn't done squat to counter that message.

We do not need more gassy platitudes, like I expect we will hear again tomorrow night.

We need an administration that has the stones to counter each and every lie and distortion that the MSM/DNC is spreading, and has been spreading for the last six years.

We need an administration that will actually defend itself.

I'm not holding my breath.


72 posted on 01/22/2007 7:39:28 PM PST by Fresh Wind (All we are sa-a-a-ying, is give Beast a chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

According to the exit polls, the percentile difference between Democrat and Republican voters in 2006 was +2 Democrats . . . The 2006 election was decided in the 'margins', i.e., the 5-7 percent undecided/non-leaner Independents [Remember, most of the Democrat gains were for seats decided by a vote margin of 2 percentage points or less!]


73 posted on 01/22/2007 7:59:54 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: alienken

Well...the MSM should all be standing under a banner that says: MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. I went searching for the mission accomplished banner, and after all this time I was still totally surprised how EVERY STORY THAT CAME UP WAS ANTI-BUSH. Some more vile than others. How can ANYONE bear up under all the crap that's been piled onto this one man. Has there been someone in recent history who has been more unfairly dumped on with such hatred and venom than George W. Bush.


74 posted on 01/22/2007 8:03:56 PM PST by Hildy (Words are mere bubbles of water...but deeds are drops of gold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

. . . give me a break.

BTW: When you kill all of the reporters, you will then need to assasinate 90% of the K-12 teachers, 97% of the university professors, and 110% of everyone involved in the entertainment industry . . . and then, just maybe, this Republican president would get the same media/cultural coverage as ANY Democrat president!

[And don't tell me Bush should just 'do a Reagan' and go over and around the media . . . If Reagan could actually do this, why was his average JA rating still lower than GWB's current average even after 2 1/2 solid years of media-induced low JA ratings? Answer: Reagan couldn't do it -- any arguments to the contrary are based on nothing more than revisionistic history!]


75 posted on 01/22/2007 8:10:01 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

He spent like a socialist democrat, added new huge entitlement programs in the field of health care and the Kennedy inspired education bills. He left the borders open for invaders from the south to rape and pillage America.

To say that his ability to express himself is inept is an understatement. His advocacy of conservative values is half hearted. The conservative movement has been damaged beyoud the ability of conservatives to repair it for at least 5 years, in fact, it may never recover. He has conducted another war of liberation which has been and will be a failure as was Bush I's war in Bosnia and Clintons wars in Somalia and Kosovo. He has managed to destroy our ability to influence other nations in the war against terrorism and is unable to lead his party. In short, GWB is an gift to the socialists that will put them in power for a long time.

No doubt the Bushbots will hate this bit of truth but so be it.


76 posted on 01/22/2007 8:24:50 PM PST by brydic1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: alienken

If there were a few more Americans and a few less Democrats, Republicans and whatever's left over in the Legislative Branch, the polls would be far different (except for the ones that are manipulated).


77 posted on 01/22/2007 8:33:21 PM PST by skr (Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl
So, because he's a lame duck now, he can do anything he wants for the next two years, and that's fine as far as you're concerned?

The point is that these polls are meaningless, yet people seem to love to post them and spend half a day fretting over what it all means. It means nothing. President Bush will do what he's going to do and these BS made-up polls won't change that a bit. Now, people can try to influence his decisions by raising hell when he goes off the reservation, but that doesn't have a damn thing to do with these silly polls.
78 posted on 01/22/2007 8:42:08 PM PST by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DrDeb

BUMP to your post. This information should be its own thread.


79 posted on 01/23/2007 2:06:31 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I think what your saying is,don't be a one issue voter. You have to look at the over all term because no one person will please everyone. I agree with this. I'm a Christian Con. but I would very seriously consider Rudy for pres. even with his background. Bush has played politics from day one. He ran as a compassionate conservative. We are just now seeing what that means- A social con. that likes to spend money and grow the Gov.. That's the beef that us cons. have against him which is much more than just one issue.
80 posted on 01/23/2007 4:31:40 AM PST by alienken (Bumper sticker idea- We have God in heaven & a Texan in the whitehouse,LIFE IS GOOD!!(not so good,))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson