To: trumandogz; Alter Kaker
Amendment XXVIII Section One: The Right of the People to be secure in their Addictions shall not be infringed
Great idea!
Yeah, that isn't going to work out so well. The libs will immediately start interpreting this to mean that there can be "reasonable" controls on addictions, including banning any of them that they don't like. They'll also come up with the line that the addictions amendment only applies to the addicted militia, and isn't an individual right.
99 posted on
01/20/2007 4:59:50 PM PST by
Hardastarboard
(DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
To: Hardastarboard
Yeah, that isn't going to work out so well. The libs will immediately start interpreting this to mean that there can be "reasonable" controls on addictions, including banning any of them that they don't like. They'll also come up with the line that the addictions amendment only applies to the addicted militia, and isn't an individual right.Of course that only underscores the importance of appointing conservatives to the Supreme and lower courts, who will respect the original intent of the author of the 28th Amendment -- a.k.a me.
100 posted on
01/20/2007 5:02:55 PM PST by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson