Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz; Alter Kaker
Amendment XXVIII

Section One: The Right of the People to be secure in their Addictions shall not be infringed

Great idea!

Yeah, that isn't going to work out so well. The libs will immediately start interpreting this to mean that there can be "reasonable" controls on addictions, including banning any of them that they don't like. They'll also come up with the line that the addictions amendment only applies to the addicted militia, and isn't an individual right.

99 posted on 01/20/2007 4:59:50 PM PST by Hardastarboard (DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Hardastarboard
Yeah, that isn't going to work out so well. The libs will immediately start interpreting this to mean that there can be "reasonable" controls on addictions, including banning any of them that they don't like. They'll also come up with the line that the addictions amendment only applies to the addicted militia, and isn't an individual right.

Of course that only underscores the importance of appointing conservatives to the Supreme and lower courts, who will respect the original intent of the author of the 28th Amendment -- a.k.a me.

100 posted on 01/20/2007 5:02:55 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson