Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/18/2007 10:17:33 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Indifferent parents out for easy money.


2 posted on 01/18/2007 10:18:09 AM PST by HarmlessLovableFuzzball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

It's time then to sue the big 3 auto makers for all the drunk drivers they sell cars to who then kill or injure innocent drivers.


3 posted on 01/18/2007 10:19:46 AM PST by hophead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

They didn't sue the computer manufacturer, the software companies or the ISP? Maybe that comes later.


4 posted on 01/18/2007 10:20:12 AM PST by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Good luck - meant sarcastically. Doubt they can be held responsible - they were just the "messengers" or "carriers," not content providers.


6 posted on 01/18/2007 10:24:24 AM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

The controls are there. If these kids can program their own profiles, they can tick a box that makes their profiles inaccessible to non-friends.

To say nothing of the fact that

1) they agreed to meet these predators
2) their parents did nothing to stop them.


7 posted on 01/18/2007 10:25:54 AM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
If these Idiotic parents would pay more attention to what their kids are doing instead of giving them free reign, they more then likely would not have this problem.

I will make a running bet that their children have,

  1. A computer in their room.
  2. A Cell phone that they have unlimited, unsupervised access to.
  3. Can go where they want to without the parents checking first.
Real good parenting skills huh? As far as I am concerned they should not have been parents to begin with.
8 posted on 01/18/2007 10:27:02 AM PST by Post-Neolithic (Money only makes Communists rich Communists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
"Hopefully these lawsuits can spur MySpace into action and prevent this from happening to another child somewhere," he said.

This another way of saying "hopefully,these lawsuits can allow me to buy that little island off the Italian coast we've always wanted"

10 posted on 01/18/2007 10:29:04 AM PST by Gay State Conservative ("The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."-Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

i noticed terrorist groups are popular on myspace as well.....i've reported this one...but i'm thinking that these dont deserve "freedom of speech " coverage and should be banned.......this is ridiculous...

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=103659445


12 posted on 01/18/2007 10:31:32 AM PST by SoothSayerONETIME
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Could the parents be sued for not paying more attention to what their children were doing online?


13 posted on 01/18/2007 10:31:36 AM PST by freedom moose (has de cultivar el que sembres)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Not myspace's fault. The parents will lose this one.


16 posted on 01/18/2007 10:33:28 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Why hasn't AOL been sued a million times over the past decade?


23 posted on 01/18/2007 10:44:33 AM PST by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

I had to go to Houston on business, and one of the men I meet with told me a story about his teenage daughter and how she was molested by a guy on myspace. His daughter and a friend meet with this guy and he drugged them and molested them for several hours. They were under the impression that their daughter was at the friends house.

He and his wife were distraught because they felt that they kept pretty tight controls on their kid, but she made a big mistake and did all of this behind their backs. Now that I have been able to see this family first hand I'm not sure what any parent could do except attempt to share the dangers of the i-net, or get rid of the computer.


25 posted on 01/18/2007 10:49:32 AM PST by c21sac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
MySpace is a business with a primary goal of generating revenue from advertisements. The larger their subscriber base, the more revenue potential they have. Thus it is in their best interest to have as many subscribers as possible.

MySpace terms of agreement state:
by using the MySpace Services, you represent and warrant that (a) all registration information you submit is truthful and accurate; (b) you will maintain the accuracy of such information; (c) you are 14 years of age or older; and (d) your use of the MySpace Services does not violate any applicable law or regulation. Your profile may be deleted and your Membership may be terminated without warning, if we believe that you are under 14 years of age.

The last sentance indicates that you can be a member and have a profile, and you may lie about your age, and if we believe that you are under 14 years of age, then your profile may be deleted and your membership may be terminated without warning.

Just yesterday CNET ran a story stating "Under fire from both the U.S. government and parental organizations, MySpace.com has announced that it is creating software to give parents a window into what their children are putting on their online profiles."

27 posted on 01/18/2007 10:55:45 AM PST by rit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
Myspace has gotten so large and high-profile that saying happened on Myspace this year is like saying something happened on "the internet" in 1999 or 2000.

The difference of course is no one can sue "the internet".

-Eric

30 posted on 01/18/2007 11:26:08 AM PST by E Rocc (Myspace "Freepers" group moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

Those poor girls are also victims of bad parenting. How predictable they aren't taking any responsibility for their part in it. Disgusting.


31 posted on 01/18/2007 11:51:21 AM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball

GOSHDARNIT, PARENTS WATCH YOUR KIDS. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT. YOU SHOULD BE WATCHING YOUR KIDS INSTEAD OF USING THE INTERNET AS A BABYSITTER. HAVE SOME RESPONSIBILTY FOR YOUR ACTIONS.


34 posted on 01/22/2007 9:58:51 PM PST by Big Guy and Rusty 99 (proud sponsor of the "helmets for democrats" foundation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HarmlessLovableFuzzball
"In our view, MySpace waited entirely too long to attempt to institute meaningful security measures that effectively increase the safety of their underage users," said Jason A. Itkin, an Arnold & Itkin lawyer.

well, in my view, the PARENTS waited entirely too long to attempt to institute meaningful security measures that effectively increase the safety of their underage users.

36 posted on 01/22/2007 10:13:31 PM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson