Are you being deliberately dense? You must be.
Unless you think the GOP is going to sign onto the Evangelicals new hotbutton moral issue of global warming, then the GOP is going to have to find a way to win without the Evangelical vote.
Do you understand that? I'm trying to go slow here, for your benefit. I've explained this three times already; this is the 4th.
So, since it's entirely unlikely the GOP will sign onto the global warming hysteria, they will lose a large chunk of the Evangelical vote. So the GOP needs to find another way to win without that vote. Which means they will have to move to the middle to gain some moderate votes.
Let me know which part of that you don't get. And let me know which part of that you want to deliberately misinterpret, because sure as shooting, that's what you do.
Look peaches, I try to be nice to my fellow freepers here but enough is enough. You're not bright enough to use condescension effectively. When you state that the GOP will have to find a way to win without Evangelicals, it evidences not just a remarkable naivete about where the GOP gets it votes from but the statement means exactly what it says, that the GOP will have to split from the Evangelicals. The reason for that split can not mitigate the split itself, it is irrelevant to the fact that there must be a split in your hubris filled view. Comprende?
And now onto Global Warming. Please provide a poll, or some proof (any proof) showing Evangelicals abandoning the GOP in droves because of Global Warming.