Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EmilyGeiger

I was telling my grandson this morning that I found a flaw in the story and that was that the scientist and a part were needed to detonate the bomb. What's up with the other 4? My grandson and I watched Sunday and Monday together... we are HUGE fans and what fun we have sharing the show. Oh and for all the pc folks, he is old enough to watch.

And even if, as you asked about there being 4 or 5 total of those parts, they would have gone up in the blast. Unless of course there are 4 more parts scattered all over the country? They don't usually leave such gaping inconsistencies that I notice and I'm sure they won't here either. I'm just curious how they will work it out.


444 posted on 01/16/2007 9:34:22 AM PST by myrabach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]


To: myrabach

IMHO, I got the impression that the nuke that went off, was a more "modern" version. This would imply that the others may be older technology. Their detonation mechanisms may be completely different. However, the next question is why the terrorists wanted this one to go off first?


470 posted on 01/16/2007 10:16:56 AM PST by pghkevin (Have you hugged your kids today? Have you thanked someone in the Military today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson