Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just sayin
I keep thinking about both boys in front of the T.V. cameras. They must realize what we all think happened to them. They are now identifiable by the world and for the rest of their lives. Was it necessary to have them present at the interview? I don't believe so if protecting them is really the issue and reason for not fully disclosing what did in fact occur.

Another thought I had was I should think rather than protecting these children a good dose of testifying to what happened during trial ought to set them free of whatever bad things this pervert caused them to do. They will eventually find satisfaction in that they helped put the perpetrator away.

95 posted on 01/15/2007 4:15:35 PM PST by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Snoopers-868th

I offer that hiding the truth provides a false sense of protection. I lean more towards your second portion. Indeed, the truth shall set you free.


107 posted on 01/15/2007 4:32:03 PM PST by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: Snoopers-868th

I didn't really think those boys needed to be in front of cameras right away. Almost seemed like added insult to injury.


128 posted on 01/15/2007 4:49:36 PM PST by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson