Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xoxoxox
KC Johnson on the special prosecutor route:

http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2007/01/special-prosecutor-route.html

171 posted on 01/15/2007 10:45:53 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H; All
I have some questions about point 5 on KC Johnson's latest entry (the special prosecutor route). KC writes:

Nifong’s recent machinations have simplified Coman’s job. Because Nifong dismissed the rape charges but retained those dealing with sexual assault and kidnapping, the theory of the crime now revolves around the accuser’s December 21 statement.

1. Were the rape charges against the three defendants dismissed with prejudice?

2. AG Cooper said at his news conference that the investigation has a fresh beginning. Doesn't that mean that all the witnesses, including the accuser, will be interviewed again? IOW, why will her December 21st statement control the theory of the crime?

3. If, for the purpose of argument, her December 21st statement controls the theory of the crime, then how are the indictments valid against the three defendants? Especially Reade?

172 posted on 01/16/2007 1:28:14 AM PST by Mad-Margaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson