How do you know Nifong did not interview her? Why would you believe a thing he says?
Do you seriously entertain the idea that Nifong or his office did not after the state lab found no Duke player DNA on her go to her and demand, explain this Ms. "They Did Not Wear Condums!" Do you seriously entertain the idea that Nifong or his office did not after the state lab found DNA from four to seven other men on her and demand, explain this Ms. "No Sex for a Week before the Party." Nifong probably personally and the DPD and his investigator at his direction most certainly asked her about all these problems with the evidence.
He was trying to win an election not commit professional suicide. He has lied to the press. He has lied in open court. Why would you believe it just because he says he did not interview her. He said that because he does not want to be arrested for this frame job. But it is just one more lie in this hoax.
Ahh, you said it much better (and sooner) than I!
How do you know Nifong did not interview her? Why would you believe a thing he says?
"How do you know Nifong did not interview her? Why would you believe a thing he says?"
Actually, I don't believe a thing Nifong says. My conclusion that he didn't interview her until much later is not based on anything he said, but is instead a reasonable inference from the timing and sequence of various events in the case, as well as the suppositions of others whose judgment I trust.
"Do you seriously entertain the idea that Nifong or his office did not after the state lab found no Duke player DNA on her go to her and demand, explain this Ms. 'They Did Not Wear Condums!' Do you seriously entertain the idea that Nifong or his office did not after the state lab found DNA from four to seven other men on her and demand, explain this Ms. 'No Sex for a Week before the Party.'"
Yes, at this juncture I do seriously entertain those ideas as at least a possibility. I also think Nifong is in equally serious ethical trouble either way. In other words, there are many ways to act unethically as a prosecutor. That we may disagree, at this point, as to the precise manner in which that occurred is of little concern to me, as we're both in complete agreement that disciplinary action is warranted.
"Nifong probably personally and the DPD and his investigator at his direction most certainly asked her about all these problems with the evidence."
To paraphrase your initial response to me: "How do you know?"
"He was trying to win an election not commit professional suicide. He has lied to the press. He has lied in open court."
Agreed.
"Why would you believe it just because he says he did not interview her. He said that because he does not want to be arrested for this frame job. But it is just one more lie in this hoax."
As I just explained, I do not believe Nifong didn't interview the accuser "just because he says he did not interview her."