Is it somehow assumed that we respect Ford's assesment of anything?
Are we supposed to agree with both his opinion of Carter AND Reagan?
not sure who assumes what, but it does provide some perspective from someone who 1) actually knew the people he was talking about, unlike us and 2) has a vastly different perspective on american politics and history by virtue of having adult memories as far back as the great depression. He actually remembers the Eisenhower administration he mentions as he (ford) was in his 40's then, unlike almost all posters here (how many octogenarians post here?). It is notable that almost no-one is commenting on his eisenhower comments.
As far as media motive in releasing comments or what-not, that is always assumed but it isn't obligatory to feel or believe as others wish. It is also worth realizing that even this article may have selectively offered comments about Reagan and not printed others which would provide more perspective, or even soften the apparent criticism he made.
That said, from the comments selected in this article, there does seem to be underlying jealousy of Reagan, but what do I know.