Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RANGEL RANKLED BY FELLOW DEM PELOSI ( Are the dems full of themselves or what )
New York Post ^ | 1/12/07 | GEOFF EARLE

Posted on 01/12/2007 11:36:28 AM PST by SomeoneNeedsToSayIt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: TNCMAXQ

You know the rule, "Don't hit the girl".

Of course, that probably never meant all that much to ol' Charlie. After all, he is one of the "protected classes".


21 posted on 01/12/2007 12:22:34 PM PST by alloysteel (Character is a private trait. Reputation is the public aspect that is revealed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; dixiechick2000; Grampa Dave; george76; Smartass; ...

22 posted on 01/12/2007 12:24:00 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

Why can't we all just get along?


23 posted on 01/12/2007 12:48:39 PM PST by SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: devolve; SomeoneNeedsToSayIt

Lol, that'll be the day!!


24 posted on 01/12/2007 12:50:07 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
"Saying it to me in private is far more important than whatever she says nationally," he huffed, referring to her weekend TV appearance.

So he's essentially calling her a liar???? Cool!

25 posted on 01/12/2007 12:59:37 PM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Actually, I think what he was saying was that she was being slightly discourteous when she announced a tax increase without consulting the head of the committee in charge of tax increases.

Similar to Speaker Pelosi’s complaint about Bush and being informed instead of consulted about the war in Iraq.

You’d think she’d be more sensitive to that!
26 posted on 01/12/2007 1:17:50 PM PST by SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
There's nothing like the smell of power hungry dems infighting with other power hungry dems. It smells like.....demcrap!

FMCDH(BITS)

27 posted on 01/12/2007 1:29:05 PM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeoneNeedsToSayIt

The rat crowd are pathetic....


28 posted on 01/12/2007 1:32:10 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeoneNeedsToSayIt

Girl fight


29 posted on 01/12/2007 1:59:31 PM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


Aha

Nice post potlatch!



30 posted on 01/12/2007 3:25:37 PM PST by devolve ( ....shop_invest_and_hire_wisely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

>>>They're full of it, all right.

that 'it' is missing a 'sh'.


31 posted on 01/12/2007 3:27:15 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (Liberals: First to demand tolerance, last to practice it when conservatives disagree with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TNCMAXQ

Maybe he knows he has more power as Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee.


32 posted on 01/12/2007 3:32:09 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

What he is saying is that Nancy doesn't get to set the agenda for his committee. She can't go on tv and say something is going to happen if she hasn't cleared it with him first.

Way it is. Way it's going to be.

Nancy looks real dumb here. It's not like she didn't know Rangel wasn't going to lay down and roll over for her.


33 posted on 01/12/2007 3:33:36 PM PST by wouldntbprudent (If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
"Quick, does anybody know if it is in the bylaws of the House, that the Speaker can be be removed from the position for "malfeasance of office"?"

I hope not... Let her stay right where she is. This country needs to take a good look at liberal asshats in power.

34 posted on 01/12/2007 4:03:27 PM PST by vlad335
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vlad335
Not Rangel , not anyone is afraid of Pelosi. She is all hot air . Lets see what happens when her blue dogs begin to bark. So ,her and Bush do have something in common. Neither one is feared in a business that runs on power and intimidation .
35 posted on 01/12/2007 4:37:53 PM PST by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
is this another example of the "men are evil and we don't need them" attitude promoted by the looney left? shove bills through congress with minimal review... nice enlightened approach to legislation.

just once i would like to see congress spend the first 3 months CUTTING existing laws, returning freedoms the laws had taken away.

36 posted on 01/12/2007 10:58:18 PM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

We need antoher Barry Goldwater!

"I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution or that have failed their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is "needed" before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should later be attacked for neglecting my constituents "interests, " I shall reply that I was informed that their main interest is liberty and that in that cause I am doing the very best I can." [Barry Goldwater]


37 posted on 01/13/2007 4:42:19 AM PST by SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SomeoneNeedsToSayIt

Only covered by the NY Post and IBD. Nothing on the broadcast News channels, or the N Y Times or Washington Post. So very, very few people know about this feud. Once again, the MSM is covering for the Democrats.


38 posted on 01/13/2007 3:29:00 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeoneNeedsToSayIt
Pelosi is arguing with a Black man? Why, thats outragous!
Clearly she must be a racist.

If it came down to arguments, Rangel would wipe the floor with Pelosi imo.
Other then that, I'm enjoying the infighting. /LMAO

39 posted on 01/13/2007 3:41:58 PM PST by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

It's one thing for San Fran Nan to ram through legislation despite Republican objections, but it's something else to do it over the wishes of her fellow Democrats.


40 posted on 01/13/2007 3:53:22 PM PST by Mr J (All IMHO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson