The claim of ignorance is typical of someone desperately looking for a reasoned argument. You appear to fit that mold well. Look around at your posting buddies here on this thread. Not one has the same read of the scope, meaning or applicability of the 2d Amendment. I guess that makes you the only complete scholar on the subject. BTW, I am familiar with all of those references, and doubt seriously how much you yourself have read them. Had you, the first thing you would recognize was that few subjects in the Constitution were free from varying opinions as to the real meaning.
But I always appreciate someone who lets the world know that he is so intelligent, others may not have an opinion.
Not at all. An Unalienable Right is exactly that. No equivocation is necessary, nor should be allowed. What do you fear from freedom? Why such a scared little rabbit that all those around you must be brought down to a lower level to make you feel somehow safer in your tiny little illusion?
Of course the Founders had varying opinions, but on some they all agreed. That free men should NEVER be restrained from bearing arms, using them in defense of themselves and their property, and as a last resort to do away with a government gone mad... on THAT, they all agreed.
If you had but a clue, you would not deny this. But you do... More's the fool you...