This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 01/09/2007 3:17:51 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason:
Please direct your comments here: |
Posted on 01/09/2007 3:02:07 PM PST by infocats
Sandy Bungler's Burglary Exposed or...Why Character Matters
My staffs investigation reveals that President Clintons former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger compromised national security much more than originally disclosed, Davis said. It is now also clear that Mr. Berger was willing to go to extraordinary lengths to compromise national security, apparently for his own convenience.
The 9/11 Commission relied on incomplete and misleading information regarding its access to documents Mr. Berger reviewed. No one ever told the Commission that Mr. Berger had access to original documents that he could have taken without detection.
We now know that Mr. Berger left stolen highly classified documents at a construction site to avoid detection. We know that Mr. Berger insisted on privacy at times to allow him to conceal documents that he stole. One witness with a very high security clearance believed he saw Berger concealing documents in his socks.
Mr. Bergers review of documents did not conform to the usual requirements for reviewing classified documents in a secure facility and under strict supervision. The Archives staffs failure to contact law enforcement immediately and their contacts with Mr. Berger about the missing documents compromised the law enforcement effort.
The compromised law enforcement effort contributes to reduced confidence that the 9/11 Commission received all the documents it requested. The execution of a search warrant before Mr. Berger knew there was an investigation would have either located additional documents or enhanced confidence that he stole no others than those he admitted to taking..............
(Excerpt) Read more at republicans.oversight.house.gov ...
Lots of unasnered questions, indeed.
It's vital to find out what was in those documents. What was Berger so interested in concealing that he didn't mind the guilty plea or the $50,000 fine?
Go ahead...make fun of my misspelling...I can take it ;-)
He's a slam-dunk to get a national security position in the Hillary Administration.
Waterboarding should help find the answers.
And who actually paid the $50K fine? That's simply Clinton Mafia walk around money.
Just teasin'. :) Thanks for posting this article, my FRiend.
Good question. That's why any decent investigative reporter should be "following the money" to see where it leads. My bet is back towards Hillary.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.