Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Official: More Troops To Deploy To Iraq
Yahooooo via AP ^ | 1/9/06

Posted on 01/09/2007 12:27:58 PM PST by areafiftyone

WASHINGTON - A first wave of additional U.S. troops will go into Iraq before the end of the month under President Bush's new plan, a senior defense official said Tuesday.

Up to 20,000 troops will be put on alert and be prepared to deploy under the president's plan, but the increase in forces on the ground will be gradual, said the official, who requested anonymity because the plans have not yet been announced.

Moving first would be the 2nd Brigade, 82nd Airborne Division, which is in Kuwait and poised to deploy quickly into Iraq.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Future Snake Eater

I always look forward to your reality checks. Stay safe, L.T.


61 posted on 01/10/2007 12:41:46 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

Beautifully stated, FSE. You've perfectly expressed the views I hold, but as I don't have your military and freeper credentials, I figured I'd be eviscerated for saying so.


62 posted on 01/10/2007 6:18:33 AM PST by Mark-in-Kentucky (Check out my sites, www.spacebuffs.com and www.ageofantiquity.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Gritty

I think we should send Pelosi with her new "gavel" over to Iraq and maybe she can knock out the enemy so they won't be a burden to the U.S.


63 posted on 01/10/2007 6:36:39 AM PST by hissingatdemocratsisfun (Jesus helped me to see that I needed to be reborn again! Thank you Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj

> "Our military can't fire their weapons on the enemy. We virtually can only return fire when we see someone shooting at us, and that may be too late. That's not how you fight a war."...

Amen. Won't somebody with the power unshackle our military to do the job that they need to do??? 20,000 or 200,000 won't make a damn bit of difference if we cut them off at the knees and prosecute those soldiers who fight as if we are in a war.

My worry is that we are sending 20,000 more, bound and gagged, trussed up for the slaughter.

Prayers prayers and more prayers.


64 posted on 01/10/2007 7:03:37 AM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

I wish a reality-checker like you had the ear of the president right now--- it doesn't look like that is the case right now.


65 posted on 01/10/2007 7:09:59 AM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

What we need is far more aggressive tactics. More men does nothing if those men aren't allowed to destroy the enemy with extreme prejudice.


66 posted on 01/10/2007 7:50:15 AM PST by JamesP81 (If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
"How odd that someone calling himself a conservative wants the President of the United States to make decisions based on opinion polls."

Notice, however, that Snow did NOT say "opinion polls", as you suggest he did. Snow said the President wouldn't make policy based on "public opinion", which suggests the actual will of the American people, not some "poll". President Bush is absolutely the most arrogant, prideful man to ever sit in the Oval Office; he thinks it's an act of shame to listen to what others have to say, and perhaps, (oh Heaven forbid), even give it serious consideration.

That aside, the error-prone Bush was told by dozens of Generals, (many high ranking, including Sec. Powell, a 4-star general), that he needed more troops. It was Rumsfeld, a politician, who kept the troop numbers down in a bid to keep the detractors of this war at bay. But the military leaders detested Rumsfeld for his micro management of this war, and they probably disliked Bush as well for playing politics with their men.

In any case, Bush today finally admitted that he was wrong to fight this war with so few troops, something that everyone, including the Girl Scout Troops figured out years ago. But as I said in an earlier post, another mere 20,000 still won't make any significant difference, he needs tens of thousands more yet to squash the resistence in a hurry, and then get on to Iran, where the real threat lies. Iraq is no longer a threat, it's just Bush's personal legacy now, which is why he's so hung up on staying there instead of taking out Ahmadinejad and his nuke programs.

67 posted on 01/10/2007 8:29:00 AM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: Future Snake Eater

Breaking News on MSNBC:

The President will announce and increase of 21,500 troops for Iraq. 17,500 for Baghdad proper and 4,000 for Anbar Province.

The President just finished a meeting with Bigs in the administration and many of the media heavys were there. Brian Williams is the source of this, I believe.


69 posted on 01/10/2007 9:11:52 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Six billion, eight hundred million dollars for the news strategy.


70 posted on 01/10/2007 9:13:40 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

and the new strategy


71 posted on 01/10/2007 9:15:03 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Hope it's not fatal, just enough to get him out of the senate (smile).


72 posted on 01/10/2007 9:30:30 AM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
Error prone? LOL! You made too much stuff up in that post for me to deal with.

I'll leave you to think that President Bush has to follow the polls (that's how 'public opinion' is assessed) to believe as Lincoln did, that the government was of and by the people.

I, as a person, voted for him to make decisions based on the knowledge he has that I don't have. I just don't happen to think that MSNBC online polls negate my choice.

73 posted on 01/10/2007 11:47:59 AM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader; Jim Robinson

>>You are right about the American people having voted for Jorge Bush,<,


Just so you know, Jim Robinson has specifically stated that you are NOT to refer to the President by this name.


74 posted on 01/10/2007 11:53:20 AM PST by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

And you might also ask that once you pacify the enemy how do you keep them that way for the next number of years. Good post FSE.


75 posted on 01/11/2007 12:31:36 AM PST by Blind Eye Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson