Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Archaeologist's Find Could Shake Up Science (Topper Site)
SP Times ^ | 1-7-2007 | Heather Urquides

Posted on 01/08/2007 11:14:54 AM PST by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: little jeremiah

True, I should have said young earth/universe creationists.


41 posted on 01/08/2007 3:20:44 PM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

Since this was the remnants of created artifacts, and would come from her productive middle age period, they actually quite later than when she was "born".

Makes sense. She looks older than that.


42 posted on 01/08/2007 5:15:06 PM PST by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

About how many of you are in the field? I mean anthropology. How much money is behind your investigations?


43 posted on 01/08/2007 5:19:42 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
About how many of you are in the field? I mean anthropology. How much money is behind your investigations?

We're a small private company. We have clients ranging from people building single family dwellings to government agencies.

44 posted on 01/08/2007 5:27:10 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
"Until the recent challenges to the Clovis theory, it was unusual for archaeologists to dig deeper than the layer of the Clovis culture, on the grounds that no human artifacts would be found older than Clovis."

Mostly true?

I'd say it defined the current state of scientific academia quite well...
My/our theory maintains that...(the earth is flat/square/roundish/tarnished, warming/cooling/flipping over/over populated/under populated/ whatever is popular)....and dissent will NOT be tolerated!

45 posted on 01/08/2007 5:43:24 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SengirV

Thanks.

There are a lot of "old earth" creationists! ;-)


46 posted on 01/08/2007 5:47:23 PM PST by little jeremiah (Only those who thirst for truth can know truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The 6000 year figure was arrived at by a certain irish bishop named Ushur, using the bible as the only data-set of his scientific study. His middle name was probably MURPHY. This proves once again what Marilyn Von Savant(IQ 230)said : You can convince a 5 year old(in sunday school)of ANYTHING, and a 95 year old of NOTHING.


47 posted on 01/08/2007 6:05:40 PM PST by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

Would that mean the Indians wiped out the white man first. And instead of us stealing and occupying their land we were just reclaiming what was ours from the beginning. No surely NOT. The only one who will care will be the liberals as their myth story will have to change in their religion.


48 posted on 01/08/2007 6:20:17 PM PST by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SengirV

Well not really. Not all creationists believe the earth is 6 millon years old. Most probably believe in some aspect of evolution of all of evolution and still find it compatable with The Creation.


49 posted on 01/08/2007 6:22:05 PM PST by therut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

Question: three hundred years ago, the Appalachians were covered with very tall trees, most of which were cut down as part of settelment. How much of the deposit along rivers running into the Atlantic is that recent?


50 posted on 01/08/2007 6:45:55 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: timer

Is that why there are so many toy dinosairs in Toys R Us?


51 posted on 01/08/2007 6:48:34 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Question: three hundred years ago, the Appalachians were covered with very tall trees, most of which were cut down as part of settelment. How much of the deposit along rivers running into the Atlantic is that recent?

Sorry, I know nothing about that part of the country. My area is the western US.

52 posted on 01/08/2007 7:39:13 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: iowamomforfreedom

Ping to 28


53 posted on 01/08/2007 7:53:42 PM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Jonah Hex

ROFLMAO!


54 posted on 01/08/2007 7:57:42 PM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

LOL Kids are fascinated by BIG dinosaUrs, maybe it has to do with our reptilian lower brains and the feminine nesting urge.


55 posted on 01/08/2007 8:28:09 PM PST by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: timer

But dinosaurs are not, lik elephants, for instance, living animals. I think kids take to them because, like dragons, they are the things of myth.


56 posted on 01/08/2007 8:48:46 PM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: blam; FairOpinion; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...
Thanks Blam.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

57 posted on 01/08/2007 10:04:44 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("I've learned to live with not knowing." -- Richard Feynman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield; RobbyS; Coyoteman
"Question: three hundred years ago, the Appalachians were covered with very tall trees, most of which were cut down as part of settelment. How much of the deposit along rivers running into the Atlantic is that recent?"

Renfield, can you answer this question for RobbyS?

58 posted on 01/08/2007 10:59:56 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

Ah yes, the power of MYTH : chinese dragons = dinosaur skeletons : vampires = rabies : Noah = hurricane : Greek Gods = greek wannabes : Aryan superiority = hitler's self deception : Sherlock Holmes = the detective in all of us.

There was an excellent show on PBS by a philosopher : The Power of Myth, some years ago. All cultures have essentially the same myth of the HERO going forth and slaying the dragon/beast, and rescuing the fair maiden in the process.

It comes from the deep neanderthal-past : cro-magnon as the brave hunter taking on mastodons/big critters, and bringing home the bacon; ginned up into LEGENDS and MYTHS.


59 posted on 01/08/2007 11:46:24 PM PST by timer (n/0=n=nx0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman; RobbyS; All

"Three hundred years ago, the Appalachians were covered with very tall trees"

Actually, there were significantly large areas such as the Shenandoah Valley, and the Barrens of Kentucky which had been burned out by the Indians and were maintained in a grassland state as a Buffalo common for all to hunt on. Don't know what changes there were as a result of European settlers, except that they killed off the buffalo.

Regarding the common age of 50 thousand years ago (kya) as a possible age for the Topper Site, and the Australian settlement.

Around 74 kya, the great Toba Caldera was formed by a gigantic volcanic eruption (18 miles by 65 miles in diameter). Scientists now believe that human kind was reduced to no more than 5 or 10,000 individuals. There was also a significant worsening of the ice age. Then around 50 kya we begin to find significant traces of a resurgent human population. It therefore makes sense that human remains would start to show up in many places again after all that time. My question: What will they find if they start looking to before 74 kya for remains?

Regarding scientific orthodoxy: Yes, the attitude of nothing before Clovis was widely held and dissent was strongly discouraged. No grant money? This was the same attitude held by the archeology establishment regarding undersea archeology, despite the fact that most major settlements are built near the ocean or where rivers enter the sea. Since sea levels for much of the past 100 ky was 300-400 feet lower than it is now, it stands to reason there must be interesting things there. Graham Hancock has spearheaded inquiries in this direction. Now all kinds of research is being done along various coast lines. Can't wait to see what the next 10 years dredges up.


60 posted on 01/09/2007 12:42:21 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson