Posted on 01/08/2007 11:14:54 AM PST by blam
True, I should have said young earth/universe creationists.
Since this was the remnants of created artifacts, and would come from her productive middle age period, they actually quite later than when she was "born".
Makes sense. She looks older than that.
About how many of you are in the field? I mean anthropology. How much money is behind your investigations?
We're a small private company. We have clients ranging from people building single family dwellings to government agencies.
Mostly true?
I'd say it defined the current state of scientific academia quite well...
My/our theory maintains that...(the earth is flat/square/roundish/tarnished, warming/cooling/flipping over/over populated/under populated/ whatever is popular)....and dissent will NOT be tolerated!
Thanks.
There are a lot of "old earth" creationists! ;-)
The 6000 year figure was arrived at by a certain irish bishop named Ushur, using the bible as the only data-set of his scientific study. His middle name was probably MURPHY. This proves once again what Marilyn Von Savant(IQ 230)said : You can convince a 5 year old(in sunday school)of ANYTHING, and a 95 year old of NOTHING.
Would that mean the Indians wiped out the white man first. And instead of us stealing and occupying their land we were just reclaiming what was ours from the beginning. No surely NOT. The only one who will care will be the liberals as their myth story will have to change in their religion.
Well not really. Not all creationists believe the earth is 6 millon years old. Most probably believe in some aspect of evolution of all of evolution and still find it compatable with The Creation.
Question: three hundred years ago, the Appalachians were covered with very tall trees, most of which were cut down as part of settelment. How much of the deposit along rivers running into the Atlantic is that recent?
Is that why there are so many toy dinosairs in Toys R Us?
Sorry, I know nothing about that part of the country. My area is the western US.
Ping to 28
ROFLMAO!
LOL Kids are fascinated by BIG dinosaUrs, maybe it has to do with our reptilian lower brains and the feminine nesting urge.
But dinosaurs are not, lik elephants, for instance, living animals. I think kids take to them because, like dragons, they are the things of myth.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
Renfield, can you answer this question for RobbyS?
Ah yes, the power of MYTH : chinese dragons = dinosaur skeletons : vampires = rabies : Noah = hurricane : Greek Gods = greek wannabes : Aryan superiority = hitler's self deception : Sherlock Holmes = the detective in all of us.
There was an excellent show on PBS by a philosopher : The Power of Myth, some years ago. All cultures have essentially the same myth of the HERO going forth and slaying the dragon/beast, and rescuing the fair maiden in the process.
It comes from the deep neanderthal-past : cro-magnon as the brave hunter taking on mastodons/big critters, and bringing home the bacon; ginned up into LEGENDS and MYTHS.
"Three hundred years ago, the Appalachians were covered with very tall trees"
Actually, there were significantly large areas such as the Shenandoah Valley, and the Barrens of Kentucky which had been burned out by the Indians and were maintained in a grassland state as a Buffalo common for all to hunt on. Don't know what changes there were as a result of European settlers, except that they killed off the buffalo.
Regarding the common age of 50 thousand years ago (kya) as a possible age for the Topper Site, and the Australian settlement.
Around 74 kya, the great Toba Caldera was formed by a gigantic volcanic eruption (18 miles by 65 miles in diameter). Scientists now believe that human kind was reduced to no more than 5 or 10,000 individuals. There was also a significant worsening of the ice age. Then around 50 kya we begin to find significant traces of a resurgent human population. It therefore makes sense that human remains would start to show up in many places again after all that time. My question: What will they find if they start looking to before 74 kya for remains?
Regarding scientific orthodoxy: Yes, the attitude of nothing before Clovis was widely held and dissent was strongly discouraged. No grant money? This was the same attitude held by the archeology establishment regarding undersea archeology, despite the fact that most major settlements are built near the ocean or where rivers enter the sea. Since sea levels for much of the past 100 ky was 300-400 feet lower than it is now, it stands to reason there must be interesting things there. Graham Hancock has spearheaded inquiries in this direction. Now all kinds of research is being done along various coast lines. Can't wait to see what the next 10 years dredges up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.