To: Flavius
Ford isn't quite as bad as GM, but they do seem to be in the business of creating one debacle after another. I have an 1997 F150 with a 4.2L. Look up "Ford 4.2L Hydro-locking" on google--there are literally thousands of people with this engine problem. And it's just one of many for Ford. They can redesign the exterior until they're blue in the face and it won't fix the problems under the hood.
23 posted on
01/07/2007 8:22:47 AM PST by
flada
(Posting in a manner reminiscent of Jen-gis Kahn.)
To: flada
Ford isn't quite as bad as GM, but they do seem to be in the business of creating one debacle after another. I have an 1997 F150 with a 4.2L. Look up "Ford 4.2L Hydro-locking" on google--there are literally thousands of people with this engine problem. And it's just one of many for Ford How can you say that?
I have a 1990 GMC Sierra with a 5.7L with 210,000 mi. It runs like a top even after being rolled over on it's side about three years ago.
I've owned Toyota and Nissan trucks and neither could hold up to a days work like a GM or Ford truck.
58 posted on
01/07/2007 9:38:17 AM PST by
Ramcat
(Thank You American Veterans)
To: flada
i drove a 1971 f100 1 mil&10k miles.drove it 34 years.so you know where i stand on fords.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson