Posted on 01/07/2007 7:07:44 AM PST by infocats
WASHINGTON, Jan. 6 — The Bush administration is expected to announce next week a major step forward in the building of the country’s first new nuclear warhead in nearly two decades. It will propose combining elements of competing designs from two weapons laboratories in an approach that some experts argue is untested and risky.
Skip to next paragraph The new weapon would not add to but replace the nation’s existing arsenal of aging warheads, with a new generation meant to be sturdier, more reliable, safer from accidental detonation and more secure from theft by terrorists.
The announcement, to be made by the interagency Nuclear Weapons Council, avoids making a choice between the two designs for a new weapon, called the Reliable Replacement Warhead, which at first would be mounted on submarine-launched missiles.
The effort, if approved by President Bush and financed by Congress, would require a huge refurbishment of the nation’s complex for nuclear design and manufacturing, with the overall bill estimated at more than $100 billion...................
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
If there is a God in Heaven, that will never happen ;-)
She is a lawyer and appears to have no love for this country. It's a bad combination.
There is nothing in my statement, either explicit or implicit, that said don't update with proven technologies well known since 1945. Who knows, perhaps some day we will regain the balls that President Truman had the last time they were used on our enemies.
Hillary is a Global Socialist as evidenced by her ill advised [ if well intentioned ] health care and gays in the military policies.
They are safe as long as they don't use these weapons against the US. I lived two years in Iran. The Iranians are not suicidal and want to live as much as we do. The security surrounding Kim Jong-il is immense. He wants to live as much as you do.
None of the above players is immune from thinking they can find a cat's paw to do the deed, and suffer the consequences, while they hide behind the uncertainty of the ultimate source and diplomacy.
That is the real danger, i.e., giving nuclear weapons to non-state actors that cannot be easily traced back to the source. The Chinese, North Koreans, Iranians, or any other potential hostile nuclear power could do the same. We need to revise our doctrinal response to take such an event into consideration and how we would retaliate. Under today's calculus, none of our potential enemies would ever launch an overt nuclear attack against the US. They would be committing national suicide and they know it.
And they know absolutely nothing about nuclear weapons. Give me a break. We are talking about a technical solution to a very real problem.
She is a political opportunist with no principles at all, not even a set of Marxist maxims. She is not even Global Civil Society and that is about the most flexible quasi-movement there is.
"As a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, the United States and other nuclear weapons states have committed, at least on paper, to the ultimate goal of “the liquidation of all their existing stockpiles” of weapons. But General Cartwright cautioned that much of the criticism of the program was cast in terms of achieving that disarmament, and he said the government’s policy, and that of the new warhead program, was to maintain a nuclear stockpile “that would be the smallest practical to maintain its credibility.”
"He described the nation’s nuclear weapons stockpile as “an artifact of the cold war — both in its delivery systems and its characteristics and certainly in its technology.”
“We stopped testing a while back. So, from the testing standpoint, we have not been fielding new weapons,” General Cartwright said. “From the standpoint of engineering and design, there has been only marginal activity, mostly reacting to the age of components.”
You are talking through your hat when it comes to nuclear technology. It has certainly evolved since 1945. Warhead design, yeild, etc. have changed so we could use them in our strategic triad.
That my friend is the the proverbial RAT HOLE that TRILLIONS of dollars poured into for the last 45yrs and you are a fool if you think another $100 billion is going to fix it!
The Iranian people are not in charge of Iran. More's the pity. The ones I've known (with a single possible exception) have been good people. The leaders want allah to come, and see starting an apocalypse and their sacred duty.
The security surrounding Kim Jong-il is immense. He wants to live as much as you do.
Yet his concern for his people is legendary.
NK and Iran are in some ways, distorted mirror images. Each dangerous in their own way.
OTOH, do I agree that we are safe from an overt nuclear attack.
It's in the Book. The Whore of Babylon, drunk on the blood of Saints...
No love of country we could survive.
She has an active, malignant, loathing of country.
Technical considerations aside, what you fail to appreciate is that our National Debt is such that foreign countries, a prime source of U.S. investment, are starting to dump their U.S. currency in favor of the Euro which will ultimately lead to a collapse in the value of the dollar, regardless of whether or not we can get deficit spending under control as promised.
Surely, if the Republicans learned nothing from the results of the last election, they should have learned that this should be an integral part of the calculus before taking on new debt.
You are really gullible. The mullahs are very worried about their personal safety and security. They have no suicide wish. Watch what they do, not what they say.
Boy, is my face red!
One of the traditional ways of getting the people's minds off the curs in power is to have a big bad external enemy.
Everett Dirkson
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.