To: HEY4QDEMS
You are trying to spin it. Making an illegal copy is not stealing, it is a transgression of copyright law, which is a intellectual construction. What if one were to ensure that only one shared copy of a given purchased copy could be played at a time? Wouldn't that be a legitimate use?
Good thing languages are not currently copyrightable isn't it?
78 posted on
01/07/2007 5:42:56 AM PST by
Paladin2
(Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
To: Paladin2
Making an illegal copy is not stealing
You are correct, but downloading an illegal copy is stealing.
Do you remember the Napster case?
79 posted on
01/08/2007 3:04:49 AM PST by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson