Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freemarket_kenshepherd
ho-hum - They still need 60 votes in the Senate and a Presidential sign-off for anything and they have no mandate...
3 posted on 01/04/2007 10:22:58 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 2banana

ho-hum. With the Republican "moderates" in the Senate (a la gang of 14) and President Bush's "new tone," they will likely have all they need to enact this.


8 posted on 01/04/2007 10:33:39 AM PST by Ingtar (Prensa dos para el ingles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: 2banana
ho-hum - They still need 60 votes in the Senate and a Presidential sign-off for anything and they have no mandate...

Do you actually believe that the Senate Republicans will have enough backbone to use the procedural filibuster the way the Democrats did? Don't fool yourself into thinking "they really need 60 votes." They have a majority and the Republicans won't have the will to stop them.

As for needed a Bush sign off, well I'll believe he's capable of vetoing bills when I see it.

10 posted on 01/04/2007 11:06:21 AM PST by usapatriot28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson