Uh, no, from the beginning of this, my commentary has ONLY been about "restoring their reputations."
I'm sorry if that has been anything less than abundantly clear.
So, in the end, what damage has been done to the young men's reputations? They're not rapists. Maybe their reputation will be that of "whoremonger" for a few years. Big whoop.
It's a pretty big whoop when someone gets kicked out of college, death threats received, the team and sport for which you've trained for years is disbanded and your parents are forced to spend gobs of money.
But hey, big whoop.
Why don't you just whoop it over to DU? They' love ya there....maybe swap stories about how they too lay down w/dogs and look where they are now...at DU.
The whole thing about hiring the strippers in the first place has been the fall-back position of the lefties who have insulted and disparaged these boys over and over again, publicly, each time another shoe proving their innocence has dropped.
It's all you got left, lol, and it's nothing.
Their reputations are damaged by the charges and the perp walk, not the party or hiring of strippers.
You entire argument is a fallacy because the "lumps" they are taking are not a result of hiring strippers for a spring break party. The lumps they are taking are the results of actions taken by other people with personal agendae in one case, staying out of jail/rehab; the other case about self-promotion to win an election.