The existence of a “trait” does require its human owner to act that “trait.” (Of course, this statement assumes that the “trait” is not a psychosis.) For example, heterosexual “orientation” requires no one to participate in rape, bigamy, prostitution, incest or any other sexual activity. Logically, therefore, the presence of a homosexual “orientation” (if such exists) requires no one to participate in homosexual activity.
which is in party why homosexual advocates went from PREFERENCE to orientation.
PREFERENCE is a choice, wherease orientation implies no choice.
Animals are often "confused" during mating season (ie frogs humpin anything female sized).
It is fascinating that homosexuals would be in such a painic attack. I now predict there will be vitamin companies which will market vitamin patches which aledge to prevent homosexuality.
Imagine how damaging that will be to homorecruiting when liberal parents secretly raise their kids with the assumption they have prevented homosexuality.