Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rocky

"I don't know what the answer is, that is, where to draw the line between a dogowner's rights and the rights of other citizens, but I do think that people who own large, powerful dogs often forget the potential danger."

I agree with you. I also think that some people are simply in denial. Dogs don't just snap. There's always something to provoke it, it's just a question of whether we see it or not. Whenever a dog attacks someone and the owner says they have always been so sweet, I cry foul. Unless you are an idiot or in denial, you must know your dog is showing warning signs.

The sad part is, the people who have strong dogs either take care of them so nothing ever happens, or they don't bother, and when something does happen, their pride will not let them say they saw it coming. Honestly, who is going to admit their dog was unstable to news crews after someone gets attacked? Why, that would put the blame where it belongs, on the owner, instead of scapegoating an entire breed.


325 posted on 12/24/2006 10:39:41 AM PST by solosmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies ]


To: solosmoke

Thank you, I have been trying to say that basically through most of my posts. Merry Christmas ~~Pandora~~


326 posted on 12/24/2006 12:56:57 PM PST by pandoraou812 ( zero tolerance and dilligaf?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson