Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GourmetDan
At what point, exactly, does 'science' simply admit that it doesn't have a clue? 99.9999% ???

Which century in the Dark Ages would you have been most comfortable living in?

Give me a break. I am no longer interested in addressing what you are saying because it is total nonsense.

185 posted on 12/22/2006 5:03:28 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
"Which century in the Dark Ages would you have been most comfortable living in?"

The fact that science was wrong in the Dark Ages and is wrong now is certainly no reason to accept it as an ultimate arbiter of truth where supernatural vs natural creation is the question.

Science is a naturalistic philosophy that requires a naturalistic answer and that is what you have. It is actually an inferior standard because of the limitations it has placed on itself. Science, by definition, is not equipped to answer the supernatural vs natural question and should not pretend that it can.

207 posted on 12/22/2006 7:14:52 PM PST by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson