Based on this, we can reasonably infer that Nifong knew precisely what he was doing when he "directed" the lab not to fully report their DNA findings.
He is one scary dude, even to be in charge of traffic court.
Nifong's refusal to follow up with the other DNA identified gives another lie to his position that he is just prosecuting a standard rape accusation. If one did believe a rape occurred, it would be standard operating procedure to follow up with any DNA identified on the supposed victim. I am surprised that those insisting that “something happened” aren’t demanding follow-up with that DNA. Someone who believes a rape occurred would have to consider other parties that left sexual DNA as at least parties of interest, I'd think.
And even those demanding that “justice be allowed to take its course” know that victim misidenifcation and confusion related to suspects is not unknown, and demand that standard investigative procedure be followed to allow the law to work the way it is supposed to.
I think the reason we are not seeing inquiries in that direction by anyone who has been following this case, be they pro-Nifong or other wise, is because by now everyone knows what happened in that room - which was nothing.