Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sissyjane

I think this explanation still fits in with the scenario of them having trouble descending and his seeing his friends lost. If he was hypothermic by 12/10, his ramblings would make some sense. But... if he died shortly after that call, how did the Tuesday cell phone turn on happen?


366 posted on 12/20/2006 7:43:36 PM PST by ican'tbelieveit (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team# 36120), KW:Folding)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]


To: ican'tbelieveit

You would have to get a better definition of what "he died not too long after" means. What is "not too long"?

Earlier on this thread I posted that I think James died close to the time the cell phone was turned on, then went off. I think he turned it on as a last act before losing conciousness forever, as a way of reaching out to his family.

I would define that as within the framework of "not too long after". But someone else, including the medical examiner, might be thinking it was within hours or minutes of his conversation with his brother. That might be, but would leave the question of how did the cell phone get turned on sometime Tuesday.


367 posted on 12/20/2006 8:22:15 PM PST by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]

To: ican'tbelieveit

Maybe when the water got into it? A short?


381 posted on 12/20/2006 9:31:59 PM PST by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson