Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
[ there seems to be something more involved in this attitude than scrupulous devotion to the scientific method -- that is, some kind of "personal stake" or other, professional, emotional, or psychological/spiritual. ]

I agree.... but then there would have to be more involved for we all observers.. All of us.. Even those of us that think they/we are totally objective.. To be totally objective you would have know everything.. You know like God.. {LoL.. snort}..

317 posted on 12/18/2006 6:26:35 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: hosepipe; Alamo-Girl; cornelis; Cicero
To be totally objective you would have know everything....

And not only that, but also you would have to abstract yourself from the "everything" in order to comment on it as if it were an "object" separable from yourself. Logically, this is what "objective" means.

Of course, this is impossible for human beings, who are both parts and participants of the whole they observe.

Thanks my dear brother hosepipe for you insights!

346 posted on 12/18/2006 7:51:15 PM PST by betty boop (Beautiful are the things we see...Much the most beautiful those we do not comprehend. -- N. Steensen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson