To: betty boop
because those eminent folks to whom you refer were not "run off by luddites" So, can you explain why RadioAstronomer's post #71 was pulled?
166 posted on
12/18/2006 2:26:50 PM PST by
shuckmaster
(An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
To: shuckmaster; betty boop; RadioAstronomer
RA wasn't *run off by Luddites*. If you look, he posted after 71 and still has an account on FR.
174 posted on
12/18/2006 2:34:30 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: shuckmaster; betty boop; RadioAstronomer
cont.
Having a post pulled because it violated posting guidelines is not being *run off*.
178 posted on
12/18/2006 2:35:56 PM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: shuckmaster; RadioAstronomer; Alamo-Girl
So, can you explain why RadioAstronomer's post #71 was pulled? No, shuckmaster, I can't. I didn't see it.
Frankly I'm surprised that anything of R-A's would be pulled, for he usually conducts himself in a very civil manner.
So, my question for you, who have seen this post: Did you notice anything "uncivil" about it? Was there name-calling? Were there attacks on persons or groups? Or anything else that might be considered a breach of civility and/or hospitality here?
230 posted on
12/18/2006 3:50:55 PM PST by
betty boop
(Beautiful are the things we see...Much the most beautiful those we do not comprehend. -- N. Steensen)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson