[Rembrandt_fan]

You wrote, "God's word has been proven to be his word through analysis of its numeric undepinnings..."

Numeric underpinnings? You're talking Biblical numerology, right? Paraphrasing Bugs Bunny, you just took a left turn at Albuquerque.

Reason and faith are not incompatible but reason and nonsense are. Arguing the validity of 'analysis of its [Biblical] underpinnings' as proof of Biblical truth brings nothing to the discussion.

[editor-surveyor]

No, I'm not talking about any kind of numerology. I'm talking about divinely provided seals on the content of most of the masoretic text through messages encoded in "long equidistant letter sequences." Some of them are so long as to deconstruct the concept of probability.