[APFel]

I thought that because you posted the following:

So ID now needs legislation to force real scientists to listen to them. Thats rich.

This is incongruent with the article. The man was persecuted for editing an article about ID. He did not force anything on anyone.

And THAT is why I wondered whether you read the article or not.

APf

[Balding_Eagle]

Never mind, the poster you're referring to has a history of misrepresenting (bording on deliberate lying) about his opponents position.

When you take a close look at his posts, you can see why he is reduced to doing that. His positions are rooted in wishful thinking.

[ndt]

"This is incongruent with the article."

Sorry, that was poorly worded.

He essentially went crying to congress that he was being discriminated against. I began to see how this could turn into an "affirmative action for ID" issue.

So I commented without clarifying what the heck I was thinking about. The written version of talking to myself.