Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog Gone
You believed the MSM report that these fine gentlemen who've been drilling this hole had no plan for it.

Anyone who reads Discover, Science, Science News, New Scientist or Scientific American, or even the Science column in the New York Times on Sundays knows everything there is to know about this hole from the day it was first proposed, to the detailed planning, to this completion of the bore itself.

I recall the boreholes drilled in California along the San Andreas and Hayward Fault zones were also subject to criticism on the same basis as this one.

21 posted on 12/15/2006 6:12:23 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

Is Science Daily the MSM?

Where can I get the real scoop on this project that refutes the reporting here? I'd love the link.


23 posted on 12/15/2006 6:14:54 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah; Dog Gone
They will have an idea of what they want to place in the hole. However they will run logs (electronic measuring devices) in the hole first to determine where they want to place the instruments. What they find out relative to the type formation, porosity and a whole host of other things will determine exactly what type of instrumentation and where it will be placed in the bore hole. Dog Gone knows what he is talking about.
43 posted on 12/15/2006 7:01:15 PM PST by cpdiii (Oil Field Trash and proud of it, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, Iconoclast)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson