What ACLU quote mining? You mean how prevailing arguments are traditionally copied into legal decisions in this county? There is nothing diingenous about that. Judges basically say they rule in favor of a party's arguments, then quote the arguments. This whole article is just typical discovery Institute arguments.
Calling me a ‘luddite’ and accusing me of living in a cave while conversing on the internet and knowing nothing about me is beyond sad.
Then don't post luddite arguments. Even the cave dwelling al-queda types (I'm not equating you with terrorism) use the internet.
Your question makes no sense. Youi align these subject the way you want and then challenge someone to deconstruct something that isn't connected except by you, or someone of like mindedness. No point in answering your nonsense. I personally reject your luddite arguments about science being to restritionist to the observable and testable. The proof is in the pudding. Science acheives and evolution is science in particularly good form.
As I stated before (on this same thread) - The opinion of this Judge, which turns out to be an ACLU ‘cut and paste’, has been applauded by many freepers. Fine, but explain how the ACLU are not just a group of cranks.
Even the cave dwelling al-queda types (I'm not equating you with terrorism) use the internet.
Why not equate me with terrorists? Dawkins, Harris, Dennett, Pinker, Myers, et al. do because of my philosophical belief in id.
Again - Are leading critics of id such as Dawkins, Harris, Dennett, Pinker, Myers, et al. merely cranks that should be exposed.?