No, the point was that you can't simply re-define a supernatural God as being bound by a re-defined 'natural'.
That's what you were doing when you said, ""If God interacts with the physical world than that interaction is NOT supernatural nor is God for that matter. God and his interactions are just a natural process that have not yet been documented (outside religious texts) and therefore are within the realm of science if they exist."
"Well now that we have your pronouncement I guess all those physicists can retire. The lack of humility of the creationists never fails to astound me."
As the extreme credulity of the evolutionists continues to astound me.