No, I'm saying you should not pretend that being 'scientific' means anything in the natural vs supernatural creation debate.
It is meaningless because science is *required* to present a 'natural' explanation. So you have one. Big whoop.
"This would return an incorrect answer if, in fact, the universe and life *were* created supernaturally."
"It is meaningless because science is *required* to present a 'natural' explanation. So you have one....."
So then where is the required natural scientific explanation to the creation of the universe? Your first comment obviously indicates you don't think it was supernatural.