[GourmetDan]

"You are correct, science does have a strong streak of reason and common sense to it. It makes the mythology and fairy tales a hard sell."

Oops, I see that you don't understand what science is and what it is not.

Science assumes 'a priori' that only naturalistic methodologies are acceptable and has therefore deliberately limited its scope. This would return an incorrect answer if, in fact, the universe and life *were* created supernaturally.

Science, by definition, can *never* answer the natural vs supernatural creation question.

But don't let that stop you from pretending that it can.

[scottdeus12]

"Science, by definition, can *never* answer the natural vs supernatural creation question.

But you can Dan, is that what you are saying?

[ndt]

"Science, by definition, can *never* answer the natural vs supernatural creation question."

If God interacts with the physical world than that interaction is NOT supernatural nor is God for that matter. God and his interactions are just a natural process that have not yet been documented (outside religious texts) and therefore are within the realm of science if they exist.

Now, where is your evidence of his existence and the force of his interactions?

P.S. try not to cut yourself on Occam's razor