Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Oval Intervention (Dowd Alert)
New York Times ^ | 9 December 2006 | Maureen Dowd

Posted on 12/09/2006 7:10:09 AM PST by shrinkermd

It is not a happy mood in the Oval Office.

Poppy is sobbing, his face in his hands, slumped in one of the yellow-and-blue striped chairs. Laura is screaming the words “Oscar de la Renta” and “rendition” into her cellphone, still seeing red after showing up at a White House gala in the same $8,400 red gown as three other women who did not happen to be first lady.

Bob Gates is grim-faced, but not as grim-faced as Barbara, whose look could freeze not only the Potomac but the Tigris and the Euphrates. Scowcroft is over on the couch, trying to nap while Kissinger drones softly in his ear.

And, of course, there is the Deprogrammer for the Decider, James Baker, perfectly suited in bright green tie and suited perfectly for his spot behind the president’s desk.

The Council of Elders had hoped this Apocalypto moment wouldn’t be necessary. They had assumed that the scorching Iraq Study Group report would have the same effect on Junior as the bucket of cold water that Mr. Baker’s strict father, a lawyer known as “the Warden,” used to throw on his face to wake him up as a boy.

But Junior is trying to wriggle away completely, offering a decidedly cool response to the attempt to yank him into the reality-based community. He rallied his last two allies — his English poodle and his Scottish terrier, Blair and Barney.

He is loath to give up his gunslinger pose to go all diplo. He cleaves to the neocon complaint that it is the realists who are now being unrealistic, thinking the administration can bargain with Syria and Iran, or that the Army can train Iraqi security forces (or, as they are known there, death squads)...

(Excerpt) Read more at select.nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iraqsurrendergroup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Maureen believes she is funny. Pinch must think so too since he pays her outrageous sums. The real test is would this woman be financially successful on the blogosphere? Actually, would many really read her?

Case closed. Insulting people you disagree with has become the new liberal answer to rational debate.

1 posted on 12/09/2006 7:10:12 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

What is this? Her Christmas story? LOL


2 posted on 12/09/2006 7:11:30 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

It seems like libs cast insults about things they would find insulting. Something tells me Mrs. Bush does not care about wearing the same dress. To a vapid lib, where form vastly outweighs function, they cry foul. Clothing is to cover naughty bits, otherwise you paid too much.


3 posted on 12/09/2006 7:15:28 AM PST by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, thats how you sell clothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

a shrill bitch preaching godlessness from a cloud.


4 posted on 12/09/2006 7:15:41 AM PST by advertising guy (If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
This is a classic case of projection. In reality, it's a view into the NY Times offices.

Just substitute Pinch for Poppy, sitting and sobbing as his empire crumbles, Maureen herself screaming into a cell phone "Mike, damn you, why did you leave me for that strumpet with the funny accent" and so on.

The NY Times in meltdown.

5 posted on 12/09/2006 7:16:52 AM PST by par4 (If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Maureen believes she is funny.

She must be. I've been laughing at her for years.

6 posted on 12/09/2006 7:17:28 AM PST by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
The funniest thing about this is that the Times expects people to pay to read it. No, I take that back. The funniest thing about this is that some people actually do pay to read it.
7 posted on 12/09/2006 7:18:54 AM PST by RichInOC ("And the Oscar goes to...Catherine."--Sir Sean Connery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

MoDo produces pure, unadulterated venom. I don't care who it's directed at, venom is not amusing. It's just venom.


8 posted on 12/09/2006 7:19:57 AM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

She's a venomous skank. Now I must go shower.


9 posted on 12/09/2006 7:20:58 AM PST by SnarlinCubBear ("Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil." -- Thomas Mann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Her supreme wit is obviously doing wonders for the NY Time's bottom line

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1750366/posts

$IGN OF THE TIMES: THIS TOWER 'FOR RENT' (NYT can't afford their new building!)


10 posted on 12/09/2006 7:26:36 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

And this is more likely to be th reason she 'scares off' men, not her 'success'.


11 posted on 12/09/2006 7:26:58 AM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Mo's turning 55 years OLD next month. The dementia will only get worse.


12 posted on 12/09/2006 7:27:08 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

You know the rules!


13 posted on 12/09/2006 7:28:22 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

what is the fascination with this overpaid under-intelligent vapid cee you next tuesday...she has no writing prowess and couldn't hold Ann Coulter's pen!!!!


14 posted on 12/09/2006 7:30:24 AM PST by hnj_00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

what is the fascination with this overpaid under-intelligent vapid cee you next tuesday...she has no writing prowess and couldn't hold Ann Coulter's pen!!!!


15 posted on 12/09/2006 7:31:56 AM PST by hnj_00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

It speaks volumes about the MSM that this toad can still keep a paycheck....


16 posted on 12/09/2006 7:33:49 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
Good morning.

With the pleasantries out of the way, you know the rules. Two refreshes and no CZJ. Sheesh.

5.56mm

17 posted on 12/09/2006 7:38:29 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I lay it all at Pinch's efforts. The NYT was founded and supported by a family with near genius IQs. Alas, Pinch proves regression to the mean does occur.

The big problem for the NYT is the two tier stock ownership permits lesser, dim bulbs such as Pinch to run things. Imagine, his idea of an open meeting with staff is when he brings in a moose doll. Supposedly, this means you can talk about the moose in the room. Get it? Some of the really smart people there must have hard time not laughing.


18 posted on 12/09/2006 7:38:35 AM PST by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd
This would actually be kind of funny if she hadn't predicated her diatribe on a false pretense:

But Junior is trying to wriggle away completely, offering a decidedly cool response to the attempt to yank him into the reality-based community.

Meaning the already debunked "Iraq report" which reads like a laundry list from a State of the Union Address.

"These are the things we would like to do if only...."

19 posted on 12/09/2006 7:39:39 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd

Her verbal gymnastics, which some may find amusing, aren't sufficient to cover the absence of any policy commentary, nor her shrewishness.


20 posted on 12/09/2006 7:40:50 AM PST by Plymouth Sentinel (Sooner Rather Than Later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson