Foley panel: GOP left pages vulnerable

Associated Press ^ | December 8, 2006 | Larry Margasak

[combat_boots]

I was going to post the article on the indication that Foley will NOT be charged, ABC Exclusive: No Prosecution Likely for Foley, but I just can't.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/12/abc_exclusive_n.html

Nothing for Foley.
Nothing for Delay.

Lies/Scams and videotape in the neverending quest for totalitarian power by the Socialists. On another thread, someone mentioned Hellary and Co. may have talked Turkey out of permitting US troop landings prior to Iraq, thereby eliminating the pincer move.

The Socialists have no intention of defending this country, and in fact wish to destroy everyone who does.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1749516/posts?page=47#42

Boots

[kcvl]

According to the Committee's report, "the communications directors for both the House Democratic Caucus and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee" in the fall of 2005 also had copies of e-mails written by Mark Foley to a congressional page, which the high school student described as "sick, sick, sick, sick."...

[marajade]

"He was preying on young teens who were in vulernable positions."

They found no wrong doing.

[marajade]

The page program isn't for Congress, its for youth.

[art_rocks]

The Dems have said there is nothing wrong with gay men working with male youths and those who disagree are homophobic.

The Dems say with Foley, the Repubs should have known what wss going to happen.

So does this mean the Dems believe we shouldn't let homosexuals be around youths of the same sex and should also be watched because something will happen?

[windchime]

Thanks! There's more info on this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1751097/posts

[mewzilla]

I'd say both parties had a hand in it...

An End to Ethics Truce? Democrats Hint at Imminent Filing of Complaint

Ethics Probes Decline On Hill Parties' Truce Leads to Inaction

And I'll bet the ethics truce is back on again....