To: scottdeus12
Not only that but if you read the real story about Lucy you will find that some of "her bones" were found a half mile or so away from the rest of them which tells me that all the bones are not from the same ape. These idiots will go to any length rather than admit they are pushing a loser.
18 posted on
12/08/2006 2:44:35 PM PST by
fish hawk
(.)
To: fish hawk
Myth! learn some real science for once.
To: fish hawk
>Not only that but if you read the real story about Lucy you will find that some of "her bones" were found a half mile or so away from the rest of them which tells me that all the bones are not from the same ape. These idiots will go to any length rather than admit they are pushing a loser.
No, Lucy is a 40% complete skeleton all from one location. There is a quote that confuses some people from a earlier interview
"Q. How far away from Lucy did you find the knee?
A. Sixty to seventy meters lower in the strata and two to three kilometers away."
Which is talking about a different knee joint found in 1973. Since then we have found other afarensis skeletons that include the knee joint.
I'm just worried that something will happen to the skeleton. The public relations backlash from some idiot attacking it would be massive.
30 posted on
12/08/2006 3:24:52 PM PST by
sydjim
To: fish hawk
Not only that but if you read the real story about Lucy you will find that some of "her bones" were found a half mile or so away from the rest of them which tells me that all the bones are not from the same ape. These idiots will go to any length rather than admit they are pushing a loser. The story is false. See Index to Creationist Claims: Claim CC003
34 posted on
12/08/2006 3:33:11 PM PST by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson