To: annie laurie
Slashdot has this covered.
Their consensus is that it's seriously flawed, and that the whole thing is wrong.
To: SteveMcKing
There are times at Slashdot when I consider DU more credible.
To: SteveMcKing
Slashdot has this covered.
Their consensus is that it's seriously flawed, and that the whole thing is wrong.
And they would be seriously correct. This is an artifact, pure and simple and someone desperate to publish got their pituitary producing testosterone instead of adrenaline in place of common sense. In my not so humble opinion.
33 posted on
12/07/2006 6:52:53 PM PST by
harrowup
(Eyes had a NassCAR wuntz; bettern' ma first; but not da bestest.)
To: SteveMcKing
Their consensus is that it's seriously flawed, and that the whole thing is wrong. by large groups of well-funded physicists who have, for three decades, unsuccessfully sought the recreation and detection of axions in the laboratory, using high-energy particle accelerators.
Lovely. I think it's great to pay for "scientists" who don't know what the hell they're doing.
40 posted on
12/07/2006 7:10:31 PM PST by
AmishDude
(I coined "Senator Ass" to describe Jim Webb. He may have already used it as a character in a novel.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson