Replies

Here is what I am saying. The libs were on the mat after 2004. They were being given the 10-count. And what did the Republican-controlled Congress do? Stab President Bush in the back. The MSM saw the opportunity, turned up the heat, leaked everything they could leak and threw everything they could at the President HOPING that the Americans would start to view the Republicans as immoral, corrupt and irresponsible with our money. And they succeeded with a little help from some idiot Pubbies. Had they not succeeded on November 7, the libs may have lost a lot of financial backers. Hell, they had to take out loans just to run the remainder of the race. And the pollsters would have ALL looked like morons.

But my other point was that I agree with you. Many Americans do still watch the alphabet channels for their news though the number is dropping and they do still have a big influence. I cannot comment on Letterman's numbers, but I thought they were dropping. Stewart's audience is probably the one that concerns me most. Personally, I cannot watch his show for more than five minutes at a time.

I can see where you'd be concerned about Stewart. He's on during primetime, not late night after the news. And he's where a lot of people get their news, not understanding the facts which his satire is based upon.

I think Stewart's funny once in awhile, but I also read FR and other news sites and already have an opinion before I watch. A lot of these people who watch are just "sheeple".

Great post.

Let's just see what we can do to make it better, Kerretarded.

Right now ................ I'm going to get about twelve Penn Dark Lagers and go down in the back acres down by the pond with the deer.

God Bless America and FR.

You are absolutely right. We had the dems dead as a doornail after 2004, and let them off the mat. If the GOP congress had done ANYTHING right, people would still be picking up the pieces of that stupid party.