Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimmyray
These are queried from a strictly conservative secular viewpoint.

Being concerned about efficient public assisstance and workers comp is "conservative"? That is, your grant the legitimacy of liberal programs by thinking it is "conservative" to minimize them by allowing the government to regulate behavior as well? In other words, the government created the problems, i.e. the programs and, since you can't get rid of them, i.e. solve the problems, you want the government to patch them up by restricting liberty, i.e. create new problems. That may reduce your burden on those programs so that government can create another program with the savings but, my friend, that ain't "conservative."
21 posted on 12/04/2006 10:22:35 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Not all of my comments were concerning government programs, but also related to private sector concerns. Would you support the removal of all restrictions on self destructive liberty? Consider, No man is an Island.


24 posted on 12/04/2006 3:32:45 PM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson