Skip to comments.
Autopsy Confirms That “Aborted” FL Baby Was Born Alive
Operation Rescue ^
| 12/2/2006
Posted on 12/04/2006 4:31:22 AM PST by Aquinasfan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-170 next last
To: RobRoy
"A lot of people really don't think about this, but imagine if prostitution was legal in this country. It would mean, at dinner parties, prostitutes would be in the same "social pecking order" as abortionists."You're probably right; abortionists murder human babies while prostitutes help to muder innocence!
This report is particularly revolting to me. I almost can't stand it!
Nancee
141
posted on
12/05/2006 3:31:30 PM PST
by
Nancee
To: Terriergal
"This is so evil... How can any human being with a soul turn a blind eye to a gasping struggling newborn?"I just don't know. I just do not understand. But this story has the effect of shredding the soul! It's so base, there are no words for it!
Nancee
142
posted on
12/05/2006 3:35:18 PM PST
by
Nancee
To: Aquinasfan
i must be missing something, did the "mother" who wanted the "fetus" "aborted" get upset when she saw the "fetus" gasping for air? what did she think was going to happen in an abortion, the goal and outcome is no more pregnancy, no more life. Second thing that i seem to be missing, who named the "fetus"? did the "mother" sentence her "fetus" to death and then name it?
it's so telling that a "fetus" is a "baby" only if it is wanted, if it's not wanted, it's trash.
Comment #144 Removed by Moderator
To: machogirl
"...it's so telling that a "fetus" is a "baby" only if it is wanted, if it's not wanted, it's trash."Well stated!
Nancee
145
posted on
12/06/2006 5:36:10 AM PST
by
Nancee
To: canislupus50
"Welcome to the Reich!"It looks and acts more and more like it; doesn't it?
Nancee
146
posted on
12/06/2006 5:37:29 AM PST
by
Nancee
To: Giant Conservative
So the location of child sacrifice is something you view to be of greater import than the willingness to commit it?Of course not.
147
posted on
12/06/2006 8:21:36 AM PST
by
syriacus
(In the last 2 1/2 years of Truman's presidency, 30,000 Americans gave their lived for Korean freedom)
To: machogirl
it's so telling that a "fetus" is a "baby" only if it is wanted, if it's not wanted, it's trash. Exactly! People don't realize what a tenuous thread that kind of definition of life is! Welcome to the Reich indeed!
148
posted on
12/06/2006 8:34:13 AM PST
by
Terriergal
(All your church are belong to us! --- The Purpose Driven Church)
To: syriacus
Then should you not, in the interest of consistency, affirm that the willingness of Abraham to kill his own child was morally wrong?
To: Lurker
Answer:
Point the pistol at his nads and say calmly, "Either you take that child out of the bag or I will take the child out of the bag, and instead of a child in the bag there will be what is left of your "package", in that bag."
At least that is what I would say.
150
posted on
12/06/2006 1:56:49 PM PST
by
Mr. Jazzy
(VPD of LCpl Smoothguy242 of 1/3 Marines, K-Bay Hawaii.)
To: Giant Conservative
Then should you not, in the interest of consistency, affirm that the willingness of Abraham to kill his own child was morally wrong? Was it?
151
posted on
12/07/2006 4:51:29 AM PST
by
syriacus
(In the last 2 1/2 years of Truman's presidency, 30,000 Americans gave their lives for Korean freedom)
To: Giant Conservative
Then should you not, in the interest of consistency, affirm that the willingness of Abraham to kill his own child was morally wrong? I'm confused as to why you are posting to me about Abraham's "willingness" to sacrifice Isaac.
Maybe I missed the part where the staff at the abortion clinic said, "God told us to kill the child."
My post was about the Towers of Silence, which are used to dispose of bodies. My post was not about human sacrifice or murder.
152
posted on
12/07/2006 6:21:45 AM PST
by
syriacus
(In the last 2 1/2 years of Truman's presidency, 30,000 Americans gave their lives for Korean freedom)
To: syriacus
"Maybe I missed the part where the staff at the abortion clinic said, "God told us to kill the child."Indeed!
And in the end, God never intended for Abraham to sacrifice his son. God provided a lamb. I have tried to understand the comparison too.
Nancee
153
posted on
12/07/2006 7:22:12 AM PST
by
Nancee
To: syriacus
It just seemed odd to post an image of the Towers of Silence in specific. Zoroastrians are rarely referenced at all, despite disproportionately constructive influence on the world. Why cast them negatively?
To: syriacus; Nancee
Was it?Of course. The willingness to kill a child is always wrong, regardless of the religious views from which that willingness springs. Some FreeRepublic posters invoke the name of "Molech" when comparing child sacrifice to abortion and that's fine, but, the "god" of Abraham fits the same mold.
To: Giant Conservative
"...the "god" of Abraham fits the same mold."With all due respect, I disagree. The willingness was not to kill a child. The willingness was to obey the Lord God! Abraham trusted God and there was a sacrifice of a child. I aaume you know your Biblical history. It is important to always know the CONTEXT of a Bible passage or verse before espousing a view point. God never intended for Abraham to sacrifice his son.
Also important to know is the fact that this particular portion of the Bible, found in the book of Genesis, is a foreshadow or a "type" of the future when God sacrificed His own Son in order to atone for the sins of the world.
So, again, I respectfully disagree with you in that Abraham, in his obedience to God, is to be likened to "Molech"
Nancee
156
posted on
12/07/2006 8:03:21 AM PST
by
Nancee
To: Aquinasfan
157
posted on
12/07/2006 9:56:38 AM PST
by
Nancee
To: Giant Conservative
the "god" of Abraham fits the same mold [as Moloch]. Thank you for explaining your opinion.
158
posted on
12/07/2006 10:08:07 AM PST
by
syriacus
(In the last 2 1/2 years of Truman's presidency, 30,000 Americans gave their lives for Korean freedom)
To: Giant Conservative
It just seemed odd to post an image of the Towers of Silence in specific. ... Why cast them negatively?Where's my negative implication?
I merely mentioned a parallel between two man-made structures, with roofs that are employed to help nature dispose of human bodies.
I don't find crosscultural comparisons "odd." I've always loved learning about other cultures.
Here's my post again...
Zoroastrians place human bodies on Towers of Silence![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b8/BombayTempleOfSilenceEngraving.jpg/230px-BombayTempleOfSilenceEngraving.jpg)
Seems pretty straightforward to me.
159
posted on
12/07/2006 10:20:21 AM PST
by
syriacus
(In the last 2 1/2 years of Truman's presidency, 30,000 Americans gave their lives for Korean freedom)
To: Giant Conservative
Of course. The willingness to kill a child is always wrong, regardless of the religious views from which that willingness springs. Some FreeRepublic posters invoke the name of "Molech" when comparing child sacrifice to abortion and that's fine, but, the "god" of Abraham fits the same mold.I'm no theologian, but it seems to me that two separate people are involved.
1. Abraham, who was willing to sacrifice ('give up') his son Isaac
and
2. Abraham's God, who had no intention of demanding that the sacrifice actually be carried out.
Child sacrifice might have been carried out by people Abraham knew, who were told their gods demanded such a sacrifice.
Whether that is true or not, as far as I know, Abraham's God has never carried through on any demand for humans to sacrifice their children.
What is your understanding of "moloch'?
160
posted on
12/07/2006 10:48:40 AM PST
by
syriacus
(In the last 2 1/2 years of Truman's presidency, 30,000 Americans gave their lives for Korean freedom)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-170 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson