Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gen. Pinochet, 91, fighting for life (suffered heart attack, last rites given)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 12/3/06 | Eduardo Gallardo - ap

Posted on 12/03/2006 1:29:35 PM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last
In case it's not clear where Pinochet thought Commies belonged...

Pinochet only had to put a couple of thousand in the boneyard.
We put a lot more there in SE Asia and couldn't stop the Commies.

The man was a miracle worker.

81 posted on 12/03/2006 3:25:34 PM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: mockingbyrd

Is he getting the same treatment Diem and Franco get?




Pretty much. Except unlike Diem, Pinochet survived and conquered...re-forming Chile into the stongest, most stable economy in Latin America. And of course, no one dares to criticize the insane dicators on the Left...who have been responsible for the deaths of millions. A joke really...

short and sweet re Pinochet:

http://www.ericmargolis.com/archives/1998/10/pinochet_is_a_h.php


82 posted on 12/03/2006 3:25:53 PM PST by eleni121 ( + En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Pinochet made it so that Chile IS a free society today.

Chile is a free society today in spite of Pinochet, not because of him. He ruled as an autocrat for 17 years, are you suggesting that the threat of a commie takeover lasted all those years? His loss in the plebiscite was a rejection of his heavy-handed rule.

83 posted on 12/03/2006 3:31:22 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Simply because the Chilean people voiced their opposition to Pinochet in the plebiscite does not mean that they made the correct choice nor does it mean that democracy in the answer in Latin America.


84 posted on 12/03/2006 3:34:07 PM PST by trumandogz (Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Just like slavery was ended and the Union saved in spite of Lincoln, not because of him, hmm ? You have a very strange mindset, sir.

The threat of a communist-totalitarian (throw in Islamofascism under that aegis, all leftist evils) takeover remains a clear and present danger, not just then, but still today, and not just in South America.


85 posted on 12/03/2006 3:39:45 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Republican democracy, as messy as it is, is not just any answer, it's the only answer.


86 posted on 12/03/2006 3:41:31 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

You are a very poor judge of men but a great judge of women. I love your home page!! Excellent choices but did you have to add that last picture. I just lost my appetite.


87 posted on 12/03/2006 3:55:15 PM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Simply because the Chilean people voiced their opposition to Pinochet in the plebiscite does not mean that they made the correct choice nor does it mean that democracy in the answer in Latin America.

Is Pinochet the answer here?

88 posted on 12/03/2006 3:56:03 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
The threat of a communist-totalitarian (throw in Islamofascism under that aegis, all leftist evils) takeover remains a clear and present danger, not just then, but still today, and not just in South America.

So you would be happier under a Pinochet than under a democratically elected government?

89 posted on 12/03/2006 3:57:39 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
I can't believe some of the posts on this thread. Sounds like the MSM has some brainwashed.

Hey, Mussolini made the trains run on time and Hitler eliminated the communists from Germany. Are you going to offer Sainthood to those folks as well?

90 posted on 12/03/2006 3:58:44 PM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Simply because the Chilean people voiced their opposition to Pinochet in the plebiscite does not mean that they made the correct choice nor does it mean that democracy in the answer in Latin America.

That's the kind of thinking that has borne fruit such as Chavez.

91 posted on 12/03/2006 3:59:25 PM PST by Wormwood (Enjoy this post while it lasts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

"Hey, Mussolini made the trains run on time and Hitler eliminated the communists from Germany. Are you going to offer Sainthood to those folks as well?"

Very good point. Everyone should remember that the ends don't always justify the means.


92 posted on 12/03/2006 4:01:43 PM PST by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Republican democracy, as messy as it is, is not just any answer, it's the only answer.

Pinochet obviously didn't believe that at all.

93 posted on 12/03/2006 4:02:50 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Dave S

This is the one thing that remains disturbing on this thread, the comparison of a great man who preserved a free and democratic society to legitimate tyrants and monsters... Stalin, Hitler, Mussolini. How many of these three stepped DOWN after calling an election ?


94 posted on 12/03/2006 4:03:42 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Pinochet restored democratic government after Allende sought to destroy it.


95 posted on 12/03/2006 4:04:53 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Just like slavery was ended and the Union saved in spite of Lincoln, not because of him, hmm ? You have a very strange mindset, sir.

Lincoln managed to do that AND work with a democratically elected Congress AND operate within the guidelines of the Constitution AND hold an open election where he stood a very real chance of losing. Like I said, Pinochet was the very antithesis of Abraham Lincoln.

96 posted on 12/03/2006 4:05:58 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

If he didn't believe it, he'd still be ruling Chile from his deathbed as that evil pig Castro is after nearly 48 years of real tyranny and true oppression. That's the difference between the right and the left. You need to get some perspective, sir.


97 posted on 12/03/2006 4:07:07 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Pinochet restored democratic government after Allende sought to destroy it.

By ruling as an autocrat for 17 years. I guess he had to destroy democracy in order to save it, huh?

98 posted on 12/03/2006 4:07:11 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

"How many of these three stepped DOWN after calling an election?"

Pinochet just stepped down because of the mounting political pressure on him and the growing anger over his iron-fisted rule. And that was after 17 years of holding onto power. You think that Chile was in a state of emergency for that long? And dictatorship was the only answer for that long? I don't think so.


99 posted on 12/03/2006 4:08:08 PM PST by blitzgig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Thanks for pointing out the similarties between the Communist and Fascist tyrants.
I have always been troubled by having to pick between extremes from the Left or the Right.Castro is an abomination but Bautista was a thief and a brute.The Bolsheviks murdered millions but the Czar was a horrid police state ruler.Somoza was replaced by Noriega and the Marxist Sandinistas.A plague on both their houses.Then there is the Russian backed Communist regime that took over Afghanistan in 1979,replaced by who?Yep,THE TALIBAN!
Things that just want to make you SCREAM.


100 posted on 12/03/2006 4:08:20 PM PST by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson