Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bjs1779
>> The "clear and convincing" standard of evidence

What I meant by that was, the standard was set by the Supreme Court in ruling against the Cruzans (IIRC) in their first suit to kill Nancy. The court said they hadn't presented clear and convincing evidence that she would be better off dead, so that became the standard. "Clear and convincing."

>> "...I will have to live with it"

Her father evidently couldn't live with it very long. He killed himself -- in 1996, I think, about five years after Nancy's death.

1,527 posted on 01/16/2007 6:40:00 PM PST by T'wit (Liberalism is in every particular the attitude and tactics of insufferable little girls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1526 | View Replies ]


To: T'wit
What I meant by that was, the standard was set by the Supreme Court in ruling against the Cruzans (IIRC) in their first suit to kill Nancy. The court said they hadn't presented clear and convincing evidence that she would be better off dead, so that became the standard. "Clear and convincing."

How can the Supreme Court over rule a probate judge who follows their own rules? I guess it's called "turned down without further comment".

1,528 posted on 01/16/2007 7:07:00 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1527 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson