Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: indylindy

I would argue that hauling a block up there isnt' any harder than hauling that much concrete up there. I think this is all quackery and only morons would buy it.

Actually, the more I think about it, I think hauling the block would be easier.


128 posted on 12/02/2006 3:26:34 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: mamelukesabre

You are probably correct. I imagine they pondered this thought. Now, when we speak of now, it is interesting, but why does it matter? It really is not that anyone any more has learned from past mistakes or from past successes! Heh heh


129 posted on 12/02/2006 3:33:37 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: mamelukesabre
About 99.99% of this "Egyptians had concrete" deal is based on a single picture they left behind showing someone pouring something into what seems to be a mold.

Here's a thought for you ~ it was undoubtedly mud, and the mold had a large block of limestone in it.

The limestone would "float" on the mud and thereby be lifted to a higher elevation.

The Egyptians would not have had to have thought much about the matter to adapt the hydraulics they saw in front of them every day to the moving of stone. They invented trigonometry without having to go through the tedium of first inventing algebra and geometry.

135 posted on 02/01/2007 4:13:09 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson