Skip to comments.
Hagel's Moment?
Washington Post ^
| 30 November 2006
| David Ignatius
Posted on 11/30/2006 5:21:12 AM PST by shrinkermd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
David Ignatius should read FR on a regular basis. If he did he would find Hagel's chances of becoming POTUS are presently about the same as Benedict Arnold's were after he offered the British West Point.
To: shrinkermd
I have to agree that it is the most wide open Pres. race, but mainly because Bush picked Cheney to be his VP, and Cheney isn't running.
2
posted on
11/30/2006 5:22:58 AM PST
by
Brilliant
To: shrinkermd
Hagel's about as popular among conservatives as Arlen Specter.
To: shrinkermd
LOL, yawn.
Another propaganda piece from a Dem hack posing as a journalist.
To bad these bastards are winning.
To: shrinkermd
Uh, Senator Hagel... Save your money.
To: shrinkermd
The MSM always loves a liberal Republican - especially one that trades on other Republicans. The ComPost is doing nothing more than blowing up Mr. Hagel's skirt.
The past election was not a "blow-out" in historical terms, and Hagel doesn't have a snowball's change in Hades of ever getting the GOP nomination - ever - but if the WAPO wants to blow in Hagel's ear, I'm sure Hagel will soon return the favor by stabbing someone in the back.
6
posted on
11/30/2006 5:26:25 AM PST
by
Obadiah
To: Brilliant
It's an interesting scenario not having any candidate from the incumbent administration on the ballot. We haven't seen this in over half a century.
To: Obadiah
To: shrinkermd
Since J F'n Kerry has fallen out, lots of dummies will make a go of it.
9
posted on
11/30/2006 5:30:16 AM PST
by
showme_the_Glory
(No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody want a peanut.....)
To: shrinkermd
10
posted on
11/30/2006 5:41:34 AM PST
by
Ogie Oglethorpe
(2nd Amendment - the reboot button on the U.S. Constitution)
To: shrinkermd
I like Chuck Hagel. He's a solid conservative on economic issues, especially compared to our current President, and he's a realist on foreign policy. We need to flush the party of big government, big-spending neo-cons, and I think nominating Hagel would be an excellent way to show a new direction for the GOP. He would bring a lot of disenchanted conservatives, especially libertarians, back into the fold. This past election cycle showed that the GOP can't win without this part of their base.
To: MinnesotaLibertarian
Libertarians and "Independents" deserted the GOP in the last election in order to "teach Republicans a lesson". We now have Democrats controlling both Houses of Congress in part because of the schooling Neal Boortz and others sought to extract. This is much the same as the lesson Libertarians and Independents also "taught" George HW Bush and the rest of the country by giving us Bill Clinton through voting for Perot in '92, and again in '96.
Ah, no thanks. Libertarians can keep Chuck Hagel. I've had more than my fill of their "lessons".
12
posted on
11/30/2006 6:15:10 AM PST
by
Obadiah
To: shrinkermd
What if the choices are Hagel, McCain, and Rudy?
Would hate that slate.
13
posted on
11/30/2006 6:21:21 AM PST
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: shrinkermd
A month ago the idea that Sen. Chuck Hagel would make a serious run for the Republican presidential nomination would have been a non-starter. Now, a month later, it is completely ludicrous.
14
posted on
11/30/2006 6:22:32 AM PST
by
Phlap
(REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
To: shrinkermd
Ignatius and the rest of the corrupt/compromised DBM know jack-sh*t about Republicans or their conservative base... zip, zero, NADA. They report on them solely as their actions affect the agenda & goals of their socialist brethren in the DNC. Republicans, to them, are a societal problem.
I pee on all DBM 'journalists'!
15
posted on
11/30/2006 6:28:06 AM PST
by
johnny7
("We took a hell of a beating." -'Vinegar Joe' Stilwell)
To: mainepatsfan
No, worse than that. He's about as well-loved as Lincoln Chafee.
16
posted on
11/30/2006 6:34:19 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(2008 is another day and another battle.)
To: mainepatsfan
Chuck Hagel? He's probably running for President because he fears that he wouldn't win the primary in a reelection bid. An actual conservative with decent funding who exposes his liberalism could undo him easily.
17
posted on
11/30/2006 6:42:39 AM PST
by
dufekin
(The New York Times: an enemy espionage agency with a newsletter of enemy propaganda)
To: shrinkermd
Hagel may capture a lot of independent votes.
I've known this guy had his eye on the Oval Office from day one when he entered the Senate.
He will probably get a lot of the women's vote.
Can't stand him. But the media may help him along and he may do better than many think. Unfortunately.
To: shrinkermd
I think it is more likely Hunter's moment. Hagel has established himself as a modern day Gerald Ford. Hunter is the Reagan Republican in this race.
19
posted on
11/30/2006 7:04:53 AM PST
by
MSF BU
To: dufekin
"An actual conservative with decent funding who exposes his liberalism could undo him easily." From your lips to Gods ears; the folks in Nebraska need to find somebody though. My guess is that his stand on immigration is enough to sink him.
20
posted on
11/30/2006 7:06:11 AM PST
by
MSF BU
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson